*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

The Bishops and Dominic Cummings

by
27 May 2020

A salvo of tweets is no substitute for purposeful conversation about the nation’s future, says Chris Baker

PA

Dominic Cummings arrives at his home in London on Tuesday

Dominic Cummings arrives at his home in London on Tuesday

WHEN more than a dozen Bishops took to Twitter on Sunday evening to criticise vehemently the Prime Minister’s defence of Dominic Cummings, I felt relieved at the belated arrival of a Church of England perspective, to cut through the current narrative of the national crisis, which has been framed by Mr Cummings. Yet, if I am honest, I was rather underwhelmed by the Bishops’ tweeted statements.

For one thing, the interventions have come rather late in the day. There have been more than 60,000 excess deaths resulting from coronavirus since the first death was recorded three short months ago. Yet religion has apparently contributed very little to the contours of the debate about the future of our society.

Second, there was a lack of penetrating perspective. Rather than a statement of considered critique that set the news agenda, it was a series of what felt like hastily coordinated individual tweets that rode on the back of the moral outrage generated by the likes of Piers Morgan and normally loyal Conservative voters.

Third, a tweet does not always convey the appropriate tone. An intervention such as “Johnson has now gone the full Trump” by the Bishop of Willesden, the Rt Revd Pete Broadbent, comes across as a clever political slogan rather than a powerfully calibrated statement conveying a political yet also theologically grounded criticism that most of a nation can rally round. Let us never forget, for example, the disproportionate devastation this disease has had on our BAME communities and those already living within the grim orbit of austerity-induced poverty.

That being said, there were some punchy tropes that were picked up on Monday by the national media. These highlighted the perceived lack of moral integrity and compassion in the political life of our country at the time of its greatest need (one rule for you, one rule for me), and the inability of those in power to apologise publicly and accept the consequences of their actions.

These factors, as the Bishop of Sheffield, Dr Pete Wilcox, reminded us, undermine the trust and accountability that is required for public-health campaigns to save countless lives: “The PM & his cabinet are undermining the trust of the electorate and the risks to life are real.”

 

BUT a salvo of tweets into the public realm is no substitute for a purposeful and national series of conversations that have religious, philosophical, and secular ideals at their core. What should a new settlement between the Government and its people look like? What are the social (as opposed to economic) priorities that the English nation should address that would allow for the flourishing of all? What is the part played by the Church, and religion in general, in helping to shape the brave new post-coronavirus era in the West in particular? What sort of leadership can the Church offer in setting policy as well as spiritual agendas?

Luckily, these sorts of conversations can be curated quickly and cheaply by a series of regional or local webinars and co-produced workshops, that can all be facilitated digitally and on a range of social-media platforms. The rate of coverage and engagement will be much wider than traditional conferences. The Church of England can also commission its own data, and its own polling, as a key contribution to the debate.

Faith groups undertake a huge amount of skilled social and community care and development. Much of it is also deeply prophetic. But does society understand this— or even care? At present, the dots are not joined up, and a coherent story that the public can understand about the nature of English society and the place of the established Church and religion within it has yet to emerge.

Thus, alongside shaping the national agenda for adaptation to a post-coronavirus world, the Church of England needs to listen honestly to what people think of it, across regions, localities, and sectors. What are positive attributes that citizens associate with a national Church? What are the negative ones? What would they like to see a national Church do and stand for in the future?

This information needs to not only set a policy agenda, but also a theological and missional one. Too often, we in the Church reflect from an internalised bubble, and this leads to a distorted view — either an exaggerated sense of our own importance, or an exaggerated sense of our own decline. The reality is, and will be, far more subtle and complex. Like all sectors of society, we need to radically reimagine both the nature of our society, and what a Church looks like that contributes meaningfully and insistently at its core.

 

SO, I return to my unease at the implications of “Cummingsgate” for the Church of England. Twitter fame emerges in 24 hours, and dissipates just as quickly. The Church must reflect urgently on how, and with what narrative, it intervenes in the public sphere. If not, then it will have been too little too late.

Podcast: Paul Vallely and Angela Tilby discuss the Dominic Cummings’s story and the bishops’ reactions

 

Professor Chris Baker is director of research at the William Temple Foundation and the William Temple Professor of Religion and Public Life at Goldsmiths, University of London.

This is an edited version of a blog that can be read here

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Church Times: about us

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)