Why was the Parish Communion Movement so successful,
changing the liturgical practice of the Church of England so
quickly?
Not the least reason for the subsequent success of the Parish
Communion Movement was the firm foundation that it was originally
given in sound liturgical practice and doctrinal definition.
Walter Frere was a pioneer, and in 1890 was responsible for
introducing a parish communion at St Faith's, a daughter church of
St Dunstan's, Stepney; and similarly this was done by John Burns at
All Saints', Middlesbrough, in 1893. Percy Dearmer commended a
parish communion in the 1909 seventh edition of The Parson's
Handbook. Charles Gore, in the The Body of Christ
(1902), clearly stated the overriding principle of such a service,
which he himself described as "the parochial communion", when he
wrote that "it cannot be said too strongly that any practice which
divorces communion or which rests content on a 'high service' with
the communion of the priest alone, really represents a seriously
defective theology."
The major phase of the movement came later, and was largely
inspired by the thinking and writings of Fr Gabriel Hebert SSM. His
Liturgy and Society (1935) became known as "the Bible of
the Parish Communion Movement". This was followed by a series of
important essays in The Parish Communion, edited by Fr
Hebert in 1937, and which set out the theology and practice that
transformed the pattern of Sunday-morning worship. Successful
liturgical missions, organised by such well-known proponents of the
movement as Brother Edward, made enormous impact on urban and rural
parishes.
The Parish Communion Movement had the support of diocesan
bishops from its inception, and was often the subject of episcopal
charges that advocated the introduction of the new pattern. In the
post-war period, the promotion of the parish communion was taken up
by the Parish and People Movement, under Kenneth Packard, and many
diocesan conferences [the precursors of diocesan synods] were
addressed by him in the 1950s with outstanding success.
Most importantly, however, the parish communion appealed to and
received a welcome from the laity. The slogan "Let the church be
the church" suddenly became a reality, when communicants discovered
their active participation in the eucharist. The sense of "being
the church" rather than "going to church" revitalised parish
worship, and the offertory procession with the bread and wine
emphasised the link between Church and society, worship and daily
work.
Another success story was the gradual way in which the parish
communion helped to break down differences of churchmanship by
uniting pulpit and altar, word and sacrament, in one central act of
worship.
Admittedly the time of the service, be it 9 or 9.45 a.m., was
extremely popular, and accounted for large numbers' becoming weekly
communicants. It was also successful with generations of
confirmation candidates who were taught to regard the Sunday
eucharist as indeed "the Lord's own service, for the Lord's own
people, on the Lord's own day". They came to their communions with
that mantra in mind, and so often remained faithful and regular
communicants; and that was the real measure of the success of the
Parish Communion Movement in its heyday.
(Canon) Terry Palmer
Magor, Monmouthshire
My recollection of rural ("area" in an urban context)
deans is of a locally long-serving cleric, usually an incumbent,
taking the work on as an additional duty. Recently, the Church
Times has advertised incumbencies that include the rural-dean
responsibility. What, if anything, has changed? P. S.
Can anyone tell me of a supplier of Bible-reading notes
who provides the notes in large-print form? I am trying to find
such a publication for a young vision-impaired member of our
congregation. My favourite suppliers do not produce such notes. I
am very surprised when we consider how many elderly Christians
there are who may welcome such help. M. MacV.
Address for answers and more questions: Out of the Question,
Church Times, 3rd floor, Invicta House, 108-114 Golden
Lane, London EC1Y 0TG.
questions@churchtimes.co.uk
We ask readers not to send us letters for forwarding, and
those giving answers to provide full name, address, and, if
possible, telephone number.