The election is over — but politics is not

by
08 June 2017

Democracy is about much more than voting, argues Joe Ware

pa

The way: voters outside a polling station in St James' Church, Edinburgh are given two choices on polling day

The way: voters outside a polling station in St James' Church, Edinburgh are given two choices on polling day

SO, IT is all over. Another election where the UK’s political landscape is thrown into the air, and we now see where the pieces have fallen (al­­though, at the time of going to press, the result was not known). The democratic ritual of casting a ballot has been completed; but now comes the real task of engaging with our new political representatives.

I always enjoy election season. Yes, the campaigning can seem repetitive, and, if you live in a marginal seat, I am sure that the endless stream of printed leaflets being stuffed through the letterbox can become tiresome.

But it is the time of year when all voters are forced to think about their political views, and to consider which party or candidate merits their support. “Do you know who you’re going to vote for?” becomes a question raised in the pub or over coffee at church. It generated a fas­cinating conversation in mine on Sunday morning (church, not pub).

 

BUT whom one votes for is one of the vaguest democratic acts that a cit­­izen will undertake in a given elec­­­tion cycle. Not only do most people live in safe seats where their vote has less potential impact: it is a completely blunt tool, and will almost certainly be misinterpreted.

In this election, was a vote for the Conservatives a vote for Brexit or energy-price caps? Was a vote for Labour support for Jeremy Corbyn as leader, or to back the local Labour candidate? What if somebody wanted to support Mr Corbyn, but his or her Labour MP was a critic of his leadership — how should that vote be interpreted? Will an Evangelical Lib Dem who votes to support the leadership of a fellow believer, Tim Farron, be viewed as doing so, or as supporting the party’s policy to decrim­inalise prostitution? Did a vote for the Christian People’s Alli­ance signal agreement with the party’s policy of replacing Trident with a defensive missile shield? The list is endless.

Advertisement

After the contested 2000 United States presidential election between Al Gore and George W. Bush, which ended in the courts, owing to a recount dispute, Bill Clinton said: “The people have spoken. But it’s going to take a while to figure out what they have said.” I would sug­gest that that is the case in every election, but there is never a clear answer.

And that is why I am sad that this is often the only time when people really think about what it is they care about politically — about which values they want their vote to represent.

A single letter to a government minister making the case for a cause that a citizen believes in, one ques­tion posed at an election hustings, or one visit to an MP’s weekly constituency surgery is a more powerful act of democratic engage­ment than all the election votes that somebody will ever cast. Because, when a citizen does one of these things, he or she is the one who defines what that intervention means. The inter­­pretation is not left up for grabs, as it is at election time: the citizen gets to make his or her case with crystal clarity.

I would not wish to downplay how lucky we are to vote, or to be­­little the campaigners who work­ed to secure universal suffrage; I want us to honour them by making the most of our democracy. Hearing Archbishop Desmond Tutu speak of the joy of being able to vote for the first time at the age of 62 makes one realise the extent to which hard-won rights can be taken for granted.

 

BUT the fact remains that most people are not tribal in their politics. They care about a range of issues and policies, represented best by dif­ferent political parties, or some­times by none at all. Even people who are politically tribal will, no doubt, have things that they want to see done, regardless of which party is in power. As Milton Friedman said: “I do not believe that the solution to our problem is simply to elect the right people. The import­ant thing is to establish a political climate of opinion which will make it pol­­itic­ally profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing.”

I want to be a part of creating a world in which who­ever is in power will be mo­­tivated to make the right choices.

The potential to make ourselves heard and bring about change is all around us if we use it; that is the real power of the country’s democracy. That is why campaigning organ­isa­tions such as Christian Aid have “local lobbyists” — armies of vol­­unteers from churches across the land who have signed up to urge their MPs to help tackle injustice and end poverty. These advocates are given training and support to maximise their democratic voice through visiting their MPs’ sur­geries, writing letters, and attending events in Westminster.

A new Parliament is a great time for people to get involved and to begin a dialogue with their MP about issues that matter to them. The UK has new political representatives: new MPs and new government ministers. Let’s tell them what we want them to do.

 

Joe Ware is a journalist and writer at Christian Aid.

Church Times: about us

Latest Cartoon

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Subscribe now to get full access

To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read up to twelve articles for free. (You will need to register.)