THERE is much disappointment at the inconclusive ending of the Living in Love and Faith (LLF) process. The General Synod is now expected to propose new groups to continue to work on the Church of England’s approach to sexuality, relationships, and identity (News, 16 January). But, for the time being at least, the Bishops have put to an end any hopes of “equal” marriage in church, and at the same time any need for episcopal provision for those who could not accept this.
Of course, almost everyone is saying how hurt they feel about it all. Perhaps more significantly, the débâcle confirms what many have long suspected: that the whole LLF process has been a disappointing waste of time and energy. Perhaps the assumption that honest conversations between those holding irreconcilable convictions about sex could bring about trust and an agreed way forward was always naïve.
Both sides of the argument now need to clarify their position. On the conservative side, there have been attempts to do this. The Revd Dr Ian Paul, in his blog, Psephizo, has reiterated with greater nuance what has been said before: that same-sex-attracted individuals should be made welcome, but should abstain from sex. This is not new, of course, but it now comes across with a shade more warmth.
On the other side, there have been attempts to make theological sense of gay relationships. The writer Dr Theo Hobson’s and the former Bishop of Worcester Dr John Inge’s Created for Love is a recent example (Books, 19 September 2025).
But those who take the liberal view sometimes assume that their permissive views on same-sex relationships are so obviously right that they need no justification. It is not enough to repeat the “DEI” formula, especially as wider society is beginning to realise that diversity and inclusivity are not necessarily compatible, let alone the last word on Christian ethics.
The real question is still how to make sense of what God might mean by same-sex attraction, and how the sexual expression of this might be recognised and received as a blessing. The Early Church scandalised many in the ancient world by its counter-cultural option of celibacy, open to women as well as men. This has proved a creative force in the history of Christianity, though it was shocking to many at the time. What is currently missing is an articulation of what particular gifts the Church might receive from committed, passionate same-sex relationships. Then, perhaps, it would be more obvious what form of public blessing might be appropriate.
Meanwhile, there has been some genuine progress. Issues in Human Sexuality is now in the dustbin, thank the Lord (News, 18 July 2025). Same-sex blessings can still take place in the context of regular worship. There is “wiggle-room” in the current arrangements, which may fall short of what many want, but potentially keeps those with doubts on board. It isn’t tidy. The Bishops deserve, perhaps, six out of ten for their efforts to keep the show on the road.