*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Leader comment: Putin, the war criminal

by
08 April 2022

NEWSPAPERS in the UK do not show images of dead people, by and large. Photographers in the field are not so squeamish, however. Early agency photos from the town of Bucha, north of Kyiv, this week, after the Russian withdrawal, carried the standard warning: “EDITORS NOTE: image depicts death”. By Tuesday, however, the warning was being left off: there were just too many such images. One body left lying in the street clearly has his hands tied behind his back, suggesting a form of execution. Most appear to be wearing civilian clothes; some are in domestic settings. The wanton destruction caused by a retreating army is common, but shocking, none the less.

The concept of a war crime is a relatively new one, developed in the 20th century and now administered by the International Criminal Court (ICC). It is hard to decide whether the existence of such a court is a sign of the sophistication of humankind or its exact opposite. There is no doubt, however, that the court will have to deal with the bodies in Bucha, painstakingly tracking the Russian army units who occupied the town. The Rome statute that establishes the authority of the ICC is clear enough. Included in its definition of a war crime is: “intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities” (Article 8.b.i).

The execution of individual civilians is arguably the slightest matter for the ICC, however. The whole of Article 8 makes it clear that war crimes were committed from the first day of the Russian action against Ukraine. The definition includes, for example, “wilful killing”, “wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health”, “extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly”, and “intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions”. Simply by prosecuting the war, President Putin faces a host of criminal charges.

The ICC’s articles make a distinction between combatants and non-combatants. Nowhere is the line more blurred than in Ukraine, where the majority of the country’s defenders are armed civilians, forced into combat by the threat of invasion. The death and injury of Ukraine’s fighting men and women should also be placed at President Putin’s feet, therefore — as should the death and injury of the Russian servicemen and -women, many of whom found themselves not defending their country or liberating an oppressed people, as they had been told, but ordered to assault a hostile population with inadequate resources. Russians, too, are victims of President Putin’s culpability. Every death in the Ukraine war is a crime.

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Forthcoming Events

6-7 September 2022
Preaching as Pilgrimage conference
From the College of Preachers.

27-28 September 2022
humbler church Bigger God conference
The HeartEdge Conference in Manchester includes the Theology Slam Live Final.

More events

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)