*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

What’s in a name, Josquin?

by
09 April 2021

Edward Wickham pays tribute to European music’s first superstar

Heritage Image Partnership/Alamy

Josquin Missa Pange lingua, labelled Missa de venerabili sacramento, JenaU 21, one of the Alamire choirbooks (Thüringer Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek, Jena)

Josquin Missa Pange lingua, labelled Missa de venerabili sacramento, JenaU 21, one of the Alamire choirbooks (Thüringer Universitäts- und La...

THERE’s no better way to put a dampener on music sales than the mention of “Anon.” Whether it be contemporary recorded albums or 16th-century motet publications, Anon. is no good for business. Far better if you can claim that the mass setting that you have spent so much time committing to disc, or laboriously typeset, is by somebody like — say – Josquin Desprez, perhaps the first superstar composer in Western music.

Long after his death in 1521, unscrupulous publishers were attributing to Josquin the works of lesser or wholly unknown musicians, such that Martin Luther — a great admirer of the composer — is quoted as having said: “Now that Josquin is dead, he is putting out more works than when he was alive.” It is for the same reason that one still finds musicologists and performers tempted beyond what is reasonable to hypothesise about a Josquinian authorship.

Even relatively well-known composers of the day suffered from the vast shadow cast by Josquin Desprez. The story is told of the young Adrian Willaert, himself no mean talent, arriving at St Peter’s, Rome, and chancing upon a performance by the papal choir of one of his motets. His gratification was short-lived; for the singers were under the mistaken impression that the piece was by the great Josquin, and, on being disabused by the true author, they no longer wished to sing it.

How had Josquin acquired this extraordinary snob appeal? Part of the answer lies in his being at the right places at the right times. We know less of Josquin’s biography than many of his contemporaries; and until recently there was among scholars a confusion between musicians of the same name which obscured even his approximate birth-date. We do at least know that he served in some of the most important musical institutions in early-modern Europe, including the Papal Chapel, the ducal chapels of Milan and Ferrara, and the French royal court.

He was at the peak of his abilities at the time when the printing of polyphonic music was being developed in Venice; and many of his works, secular as well as sacred, take pride of place in these volumes. But most significantly, he was a character who fitted the new Renaissance template of artistic genius: unpredictable, difficult, and reassuringly expensive.

Yet the reputation is not a matter merely of smoke and mirrors. There is something discernibly fresh and modern about the musical style pioneered by Josquin — and, to be fair, a number of his contemporaries — in the period around 1500. For many years, I directed an ensemble whose core repertoire was the sacred polyphony of the 15th and early 16th centuries. When in concert we emerged from the dense, fascinating sound-world of earlier composers such as Dufay and Ockeghem into the clear, crystalline realms of Josquin, there would be a noticeable relaxation among the audience: a sense finally of recognition.

Heritage Image partnership/AlamyWoodcut of Josquin Desprez, c.1611, copied from an oil painting done during his lifetime, and since lostThe stylistic innovations of Josquin and his generation informed the development of polyphonic composition over many decades, establishing the deep grammar for what music historians have often referred to as the common language of 16th-century European music. It was the language spoken by Victoria and Byrd, by Lassus and, crucially, by Palestrina, several of whose Masses adapt themes taken from Josquin, and whose sacred music has been regarded for centuries as the acme of propriety in church music. It is that language, albeit inflected with archaic forms, which audiences are recognising when they hear Josquin’s polyphony.

Take, for instance, the motet that the Venetian music publisher Ottaviano Petrucci chose to open his very first collection of motets, dating from 1502. Ave Maria . . . virgo serena comprises short, simple melodic lines, presented and then strictly imitated in all four voice-parts. The text is set syllabically and thus intelligibly. At crucial moments, the four voices coalesce and together declaim the text with hymn-like simplicity. Judging by the number of manuscript and print sources in which it appears, Ave Maria . . . virgo serena was top of the early-Renaissance hit parade.

In truth, however, there is no “typical” Josquin style. Each work does something slightly different: making use of chant or song influences in different ways, indulging in compositional puzzles, or challenging the composer to create variety in long or unyielding texts. One of his more eccentric motets is a setting of the Genealogy of Christ, consisting of a string of barely pronounceable names. If anyone were inclined to accuse Josquin of being humourless, note the way in which he sets the name of Zorobabel with childish exuberance. But this also presents a challenge to listeners and choirs seeking an entry-point into the repertoire.

There is no longer any shortage of good recordings of the music, and my Josquin Playlists 101 would include motets such as the Ave Maria mentioned earlier, Pater Noster — which Josquin requested to be sung on the anniversary of his death — and the lament on the death of Ockeghem, Nymphes des bois, a fascinating and straightforwardly beautiful hybrid of the sacred and secular. Of the mass settings, the place to start is — as I did, when a student — with Missa Pange lingua, which, like the greatest works of Bach, achieves the perfect balance of form, content, and theology.

The difficulty for modern choirs in any music of this period is the voice distribution, which does not conform to our established soprano-alto-tenor-bass format, but, rather, tends towards two voice-parts of equal range in the middle of the ensemble. But, if you are blessed with high tenors or with altos capable of plunging some distance below the stave, then any of the works mentioned above are within the grasp of ambitious amateur choirs. Nor is a doctorate required to interpret these works: there is no shame in pulling a score from www.cpdl.org and having a go. At the conclusion of Ave Maria, Josquin interpolates a very personal prayer: “memento mei.” In this anniversary year, all lovers of church music should be paying Josquin this service.

Church Times Bookshop

Save money on books reviewed or featured in the Church Times. To get your reader discount:

> Click on the “Church Times Bookshop” link at the end of the review.

> Call 0845 017 6965 (Mon-Fri, 9.30am-5pm).

The reader discount is valid for two months after the review publication date. E&OE

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)