*** DEBUG END ***

Letters to the Editor

07 May 2021

Church Times letters: letters@churchtimes.co.uk We regret that we cannot guarantee consideration of letters submitted by post under present working conditions


Workplace dignity and Oxford dons

From Professors Gordon Lynch, Stephen Pattison, and Linda Woodhead, and 21 others

Sir, — We write as academics working in the field of theology and religious studies to express our concern about ongoing events at Christ Church, Oxford, in which several of our colleagues are involved.

We affirm the basic principle of dignity in the workplace and note the importance of upholding that principle in relation to all parties involved in investigatory and disciplinary processes. Unless used efficiently and humanely, such processes themselves cause harm. The previous disproportionate actions by the College against the Dean, the Very Revd Professor Martyn Percy, have contributed to a current situation in which no one is well served.

We welcome the Charity Commission’s interest in this case. We also believe that senior figures in the University of Oxford, such as the Vice-Chancellor, as well as senior leaders in the Church of England, have a responsibility for upholding the basic principle of dignity for all in the workplace, and should not merely remain silent.

We call upon them, and all colleagues directly involved, to help achieve a just and speedy resolution.

c/o Department of Philosophy, Politics and Religion
Lancaster University
Lancaster LA1 4YD


Archbishop of Canterbury on political standards

From Don Manley

Sir, — The Old Testament obviously misreported the prophets. Isaiah really said something like this: “It’s a pity about the drunkards of Ephraim, but there you go — one or two of them always liked a drink too many. ’Twas ever thus.’’ And what Amos actually said was ‘‘Yes, alas! there are a few rotten shepherds, but there’s nothing much we can do about it.” In making allowances for our Prime Minister (News, 30 April), the Archbishop of Canterbury is surely following what we now understand to be the prophets’ authentic messages.

26 Hayward Road
Oxford OX2 8LW


From Mr Bob Thomas

Sir, — What hope is there for a Church whose leaders cannot promote integrity in public life? It is any surprise that more and more people find the Church irrelevant, when it does not even stand up for the truth? What relevance can the people see in a Church that sets the moral bar so low that honesty counts for nothing?

Ted Hastings recently asked in Line of Duty:When did we stop caring about honesty?” Perhaps society at large does not care for truth any more, but whose fault is that, when church leaders do not seem to care either?

Church attendance continues to fall at an increasing rate. If there is no Church left in 50 years’ time, it will not be due to styles of worship or the quality of the coffee served on a Sunday morning, but because the Church’s leaders have preferred to bolster the political status quo rather than speak truth to power.

BOB THOMAS (Reader Emeritus)
31 Lodge Road
Locks Heath SO31 6QY


Elections to the General Synod’s House of Clergy

From Prebendary Sarah Schofield

Sir, — As the time for elections to the General Synod draws near, I would like to offer some reflections on my five years, which ended this year, spent on the Archbishops’ Council as an elected member. Attention has rightly been drawn to the part played by those at the highest levels in transforming the leadership of the Church of England; but there is, I believe, a risk that ordinary electors let themselves off the hook. My concern arises out of the 2020 elections from the House of Clergy to the Archbishops’ Council.

Despite #MeToo, Black Lives Matter and a Church-wide concern about the involvement of young people in governance, the House of Clergy nominees to Archbishops’ Council elections were all male, white, and aged 50 or above — worse than in 2015, when there was one female priest and a smattering of people under 50. In contrast, over my five-year term, vacant places for Archbishops’ appointments were advertised and interviews were held. These resulted in young, female, and UKME candidates’ being proposed to the Synod by the Archbishops, whereas in 2020 the House of Clergy narrowed the range of people it considered for election in almost every area, visible disability being a notable exception.

There is not much democracy in the Church of England, but, where there is, it must be used to hold the institution to account. Not to vote or not to nominate people for election is simply to increase the influence of those who do. If we are going to transform the Church, that means transforming its democratic institutions. Fellow Synod members often tell me, and I have said it myself, that they “speak up for others”; but how much better to have “the others” in the Synod chamber!

I urge existing members to act as mentors, encouragers, and nominators, even if you are standing again and this might risk your losing to someone else. The tradition of losing something to gain something is well established in Christian theology: why should it not be applied to a Synod election?

On the basis of the House of Clergy elections to the Archbishops’ Council, I fear that the older white men of the Church of England, some of whom have the best of intentions on behalf of “the outsider”, will continue to crowd the powerful “insider” places. If we do not have a far wider range of people on our ballot papers in the Synod elections, it will be an indictment of the depth of genuine commitment among the clergy to a more diverse leadership.

The Chaplaincy, Molineux Street
University of Wolverhampton
Wolverhampton WV1 1DT


Covid-19 memorial

From Lorna Dorrinton

Sir, — It was with great sadness that I read of the campaign to raise 2.3 million to build a memorial in St Paul’s Cathedral to commemorate those who have died of Covd-19. I am sure that within this wonderful building a quiet place could be found and set aside for people to pray, reflect, and lament about the events of 2020-21. If desired, a small plaque could be designed and produced by one of the cathedral’s stonemasons.

Surely, the past year has highlighted so many of the areas of need within our society and the world — not least poverty, the hungry, homelessness, care of the vulnerable, the lonely, and those suffering with mental-heath challenges. I can think of far better uses for this vast sum of money, and ones that will help to build God’s Kingdom on earth. Matthew 25 comes to mind.

3 Richmond Terrace, Appledore
Devon EX39 1PG


The C of E and Shell

From Dr Robin Rowles

Sir, — It is certainly disconcerting to read the comments in Canon Rachel Mash’s letter (30 April) about the destruction caused by what Shell is doing in Africa. I do hope this doesn’t mean that Canon Mash is implying that we abandon “big oil” and turn our thoughts, for instance, to electric vehicles (EVs) and their obvious environmental advantages, because I have bad news.

Lithium mining (for EV and other batteries) is as big an environmental disaster as oil exploration, if not bigger, if the reports coming out of northern Portugal are to be believed. Indeed, it is seen as such a disaster that the Portuguese government has cancelled the licence of the mining company involved!

Address supplied

The C of E’s engagement with Shell is being led by the Pensions Board, not the Church Commissioners, as stated in last week’s letter. We apologise for the error. Editor


Black and Tans and the brutality in Ireland, 1921

From Mr P. C. Thompson

Sir, — I refer to the piece in the 100 Years Ago spot (23 April). The headline “Police ‘excesses’ in Ireland” betrays a lamentable ignorance of the situation in Ireland at the time.

The “corps” that Lloyd George referred to cannot possibly have been the police force, the Royal Irish Constabulary: it is inconceivable that more than 300 men of the RIC should have been found “unsuitable as members of the police force”. Lloyd George’s “corps” must be the auxiliary force known as the Black and Tans, whose members often behaved disgracefully.

As an Irish friend has written to me, “It is a tragedy that the reputation of the RIC has been sullied — irrevocably for some people — by association with the Auxiliaries and Black and Tans.”

16 Edgar Street
Worcester WR1 2LR


Prisoner in Iran

From Mr David Wang

Sir, — When will our Government stop the ridiculous political posturing over the case of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe (News, 30 April)? It is gross hypocrisy, when we have the means to end the dispute and the hostage situation, which for some time has been known to be about a historic arms deal, and is acknowledged to be so by Iran.

This family has suffered enough. I am surprised that the Church is not speaking out loudly to our Government on the importance of acting justly. I can see no moral justification for not expeditiously paying back the financial debt and interest owed, regardless of anything else, or we are in danger being the ones holding this dear family hostage.

121 East Acton Lane
London W3 7HB


Non-white martyrdom

From Mr John J. C. Freeman

Sir, — Things are not as dire as Canon Gomersall stated (Letters, 30 April). In the lectionary, we remember the seven Melanesian Martyrs on 24 April. Out of his total of 325 this comes to 2.15 per cent. They were citizens of either Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, or the Solomon Islands, and I can assure Canon Gomersall that they would be fairly classified as black members of the Church. I acknowledge that they were all men, but they were not clergy, and, as members of the Melanesian Brotherhood, they were celibate.

20a Leigh Way, Weaverham
Northwich CW8 3PR


Why speak of power?

From the Rt Revd Jan McFarlane

Sir, — I was pleased to hear of the new report to support clergy through each stage of our working lives, but am alarmed at the title, Moving in Power (News, 23 April). In power? Don’t we “move in service”?

19a The Close, Lichfield WS13 7LD

Browse Church and Charity jobs on the Church Times jobsite

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear below your letter unless requested otherwise.

Forthcoming Events


Church Times/RSCM: 

Intercultural Church for a Multicultural World

28 May 2024

A Church Times/Church House Publishing webinar

Tickets are FREE


Church Times/Modern Church:

A Political Faith?

Monday 3 June 2024

This panel will explore where Christians have come to in terms of political power and ask, where should we go next?

Online tickets available


Church Times/Modern Church:

Participating in Democracy

Monday 10 June 2024

This panel will explore the power of voting, and power beyond voting.

Online tickets available


Green Church Awards

Closing date: 30 June 2024

Read more details about the awards


Church Times/Canterbury Press:

Festival of Preaching

15-17 September 2024

The festival moves to Cambridge along with a sparkling selection of expert speakers

Early bird tickets available



The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times


To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)