*** DEBUG END ***

A manifesto for a post-Brexit United Kingdom

28 February 2020

As a bewildered nation ceases to be part of the European project, Sam Wells says, he charts a way forward

I HAVE come to believe that Re­­­main deserved to lose the 2016 EU Referendum because it failed to articulate a positive European iden­tity and mission that the UK would be foolish, reckless, and culturally impoverished to leave.

I suggest, however, that the Brex­iteers have now had four years to articulate a renewed UK identity that it was worth all this trouble to reassert, and I see no sign that they have made any progress at all.

The referendum, and almost all the foregoing and subsequent de­­bate, have concentrated on eco­nomics and politics — but the real issue is one of identity.

This nation had a part to play in upholding Protestantism, and subse­quently a part in advancing Chris­tianity, commerce, and civilisation in the British Empire. After the Empire, it chose to become part of the European project. Now, it has chosen to cease to be part of that project. What might its new part be?

I want to offer a brief, immodestly titled “Manifesto for a United King­dom”, in six steps.

1 We need to start by saying we’re a bigger and better people than we have been amid the ugly and bitter squabbling of the past four years. We may, indeed, recognise that pro­found divisions have been laid bare, and that talk of healing is cynically premature. But the least that we can do is to stop speaking and acting in ways that evidently exacerbate those divisions.

Those who feel passionately need to try at least as hard to portray the arguments of their antagonists in the best possible light as they do to find well-chosen words to validate their own stance. The problem with war is that you become as bad as your enemy. We need at least to declare a ceasefire.

2 We need to tell a truthful story about our past. The pilots who won the Battle of Britain were inde­scribably brave and sacrificial. But a lot of them were Polish. (One fifth were foreign nationals.) And the Second World War was won because Hitler overreached himself in Russia, and American forces eventually over­­­­­­­­­­­­­whelmed Germany and Japan.

The recent film 1917 has been lauded for its cinematography, but its history is truly terrible: it under­writes a story in which the British were plucky in ingenuity and super­human in initiative, while the Germans were beastly and duplic­itous and deserved everything they got.

3 We need to take active steps to recognise publicly the flawed and complex history of our nation. The theologian Andrew Shanks talks of our vocation to be a pioneeringly honest ex-oppressor country.

We have behaved as if we needed only to talk up our successes and deny our failures, and everyone would be convinced. But Neil MacGregor’s magnificent Radio 4 series As Others See Us demon­strated time after time that nation after nation regards the UK as a country that consis­tently over­promises and underdelivers, with a mouth per­petually bigger than its trousers and a truth much humbler than its official history.

The problem with the Windrush scandal is not simply that people were ungraciously and unjustly treated in 1948, or even that people have been even more unjustly and ungraciously treated in recent years. It’s that we are treating this as an unfortunate and out-of-character blunder, rather than the tip of a very deep iceberg.

We have told ourselves that we were the good guys in world and European history, and shouted down anyone who maintained otherwise. It’s not true. Only the truth will set us free.

4 We need to make the most of this confused and, in some cases, bewildered moment in the life of our nation. Out of crisis and dismay come discovery and renewal. I would like to see Brexit marked not with a bong but with a full array of public displays of lament, celebration, and rededication.

Lament means extolling the glory of God, contrasting it with the plight of creation, and asking God to ad­­dress the gap; it can also involve re­­pentance for mistakes and for com­plicity in wrongdoing. Celebra­tion affirms life, creativity, joy, and collaboration. Rededication synthe­sises lament and celebration with a com­mitment to a shared future.

That is what Westminster Abbey and St Paul’s Cathedral exist for; but it would need to be a truly national rather than Londoncentric endeav­our. If you doubt the power or possibility of public sacred or secular liturgy, consider the effect of the 2012 Olympic opening ceremony, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s wedding, in capturing and reflecting the public mood.

5 Once, Britain was the global leader in taking control of other cul­tures and introducing its own gospel of Anglophone institutions, extens­ive communications, educa­tion, health, and exploitative com­merce based on extraction of local minerals. It now has the opportunity to become a global leader on the two most pressing issues of our day.

Most obvious is the climate emer­gency. The UK has a reputa­tion for ducking and diving on Euro­pean legislation, dragging its feet, and constantly complaining to the ref­­eree. What if it seized this moment of global rabbit-in-head­lights para­­lysis and put its commer­cial, insti­tutional, and governmental weight behind be­­coming the blue-ribbon post-carbon society? Then it could truly claim to have seized the Brexit moment.

What the terror of nuclear war once was, the ecological movement has become: a quasi-religious quest to save humanity from itself. Britain could transform itself almost over­night from the skulker in the corner of multilateral partnership to the gold standard.

6 The other most pressing issue of our day is, paradoxically, how we are to live with one another across pro­­found differences of religion, race, conviction, and class, and amid painful legacies of hurt, hardship, oppression, and injustice.

The Brexit civil war sets an un­­promising precedent. But if the UK is so wonderful that it should shrug off the European yoke, that must surely be the UK of the present and future, not a constructed UK of an imagined past. My fundamental theo­­­logical con­vic­tion is that God gives us every­thing we need to fulfil our calling to be a flourishing so­­ciety, fully alive. If we experience our lives as scarcity, it is because we re­­fuse to receive the abundant gifts that God is giving us.

God is giving us abundant gifts in those on whom society is inclined to turn its back: those with disabil­ities, asylum-seekers, those with a criminal record, those whose gender and/or sexuality lies outside a real or imagined norm. Historically, our culture has struggled to see past such labels to perceive the glory of what lies beyond and within. This is a mo­­ment when we can realign our country to release the talents of all its people, especially those so long ex­­cluded or neglected, and rejoice in the blessings that ensue.

LET us become a pioneeringly honest ex-oppressor nation. Let us welcome the gifts of every person in society. Let us embark on a process of lament, celebration, and renewal. Let us rejoice that God gives us every­­thing we need. And let us seize this moment to discover a future that is bigger than the past.

Canon Wells is the Vicar of St Martin-in-the-Fields, London. This article originated in a dialogue at the church last week with the Revd Pro­fessor Diarmaid MacCulloch.

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)