*** DEBUG END ***

Not over yet

09 February 2018

IT IS a familiar story: winning a vote — or, for the suffragists, gain­ing it . . . and then realising that the battle has only just started. In January 1918, the Church Times was wrong to believe that a move to defer women’s suffrage to the age of 30 would be defeated because “a woman of twenty-one is more mature than a youth of that age.” We shall have to wait another ten years before celebrating the centenary of universal and equal suffrage. This, though, was just a final throw of the old guard, and the victory in February 1918 deserved the plaudit given to it in the Mothers’ Union Journal of that year: “The vote is a duty we owe to womankind — a responsibility laid upon us by God.”

Ahead of those first women voters lay problems that they would find harder to solve. The Church Times, 27 December 1918, hinted at these in a sketch of two women, the Misses Jenny and Letty Lavender, one of whom had voted in the General Election 13 days earlier. The other, Miss Letty, had not, despite having been a suffragette. She simply did not trust her Liberal candidate:

“Mr Lloyd George said it was our duty to use the vote, and if we didn’t it would show we didn’t care to have it,” Miss Letty went on, as she stood with one hand on the gate, her eyes following the movements of an old grey horse in the opposite field. “I’ve wanted the vote, looked forward to it, prayed for it. But I couldn’t bring myself to feel that it didn’t matter who the man was or what his opinions were, so long as he supported Lloyd George now.”

It would be decades before the newly enfranchised had the option of voting for a woman, even longer until they could vote for a choice of women who held political views with which they might agree. At the 2017 General Election, the proportion of women MPs passed the 30-per-cent mark for the first time.

Over a century, we have learnt slowly that equality and op­por­tunity have multiple layers: that opening the door to women in each branch of activity is only the outer layer. It has been illegal to discriminate against women for many years, and yet the pau­city of women in senior positions in most fields indica­tes the distance that must still be travelled. And what of the Church, where women outnumber men in most congregations and yet, in senior posts, lay as well as clerical, men outnumber women? It goes without saying that the Church should have been in the forefront of the campaign to mirror God’s equal love and equal regard for women and men. In judging past generations for their failings, however, it is worth asking how future generations will judge us. “Daddy, what did you do in the great war for equality?”

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Forthcoming Events

6-7 September 2022
Preaching as Pilgrimage conference
From the College of Preachers.

27-28 September 2022
humbler church Bigger God conference
The HeartEdge Conference in Manchester includes the Theology Slam Live Final.

More events

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four* articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)

*Until the end of June: we’re doubling the number of free articles to eight, to celebrate the publication of our Platinum Jubilee double issue.