*** DEBUG END ***

Angela Tilby: My worries about the trans lobby

19 October 2018


THE time for public consultation on the Reform of the Gender Recognition Act (2004) has just run out. Currently, if an individual wishes to change gender, he or she must obtain medical evidence of gender dysphoria and make a commitment to living in his or her desired gender until death. There is also a fee.

Trans lobbyists describe the process as “intrusive, costly, and humiliating”. They think that self-declaration should be the critical issue, and that this should be independent of any intention to transition surgically. The Women and Equalities Minister, Penny Mordaunt, supports changes to the current law.

But it has proved hard to debate the proposed reforms publicly. Planned events have often been cancelled, owing to aggressive lobbying from men who now identify as women — and, of course, nobody wants to appear transphobic.

In 1979, a radical lesbian feminist, Janice Raymond, published The Transsexual Empire: The making of the She-Male. Raymond’s argument was that men who sought to become women were attempting to “colonise” women’s experience, which was, she argued, a form of sexual assault.

At the time, I thought that this was interesting, if rather extreme. I had read Jan Morris’s Conundrum, in which she described how, although born male, she had always identified with the feminine. I could not see anything in her experience to suggest that trans women were determined to take other women over.

Yet the bullying behaviour of some trans women towards their critics has given me pause. There has not been enough debate about the relationship between birth sex and gender, and the place that public endorsement plays in our sense of who we are. The feminist argument that trans women are not real women because they have not experienced the way that birth women are socialised carries weight.

More specifically, I am not sure that I want to share public loos with people who have male genitalia, since there is no way of knowing who might constitute a risk to other women. I think that Raymond overstated her case, but she was perhaps on to something. If the trans lobby get their way, the right to safety and privacy that most women expect will be compromised. Of course. Again.

Interestingly, Morris herself has tried to take the heat out of the argument and to support women who feel under threat. She also said recently that she regarded her own experience as truly privileged: she has had the opportunity to live in both genders.

The real issue here is whether personal identity is created by an act of individual will, or whether it has, in some sense, to be negotiated socially. The modest requirement for some medical endorsement before a legal change of gender seems to me to honour the Christian and common-sense perspective that I receive who I am before I declare who I am. Recognition is a two-way process.

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Job of the Week


Train-a-Priest Fund 2022 Appeal

Please consider a donation to TAP Africa this year. Every penny you can give goes to ordinands in Africa who face financial difficulty, to support them as they complete their training. 

Donate online

Read more about this year's appeal

Forthcoming Events

24 May 2022
Disability and Church: Intersectionality
A joint webinar from HeartEdge and Church Times.

2 July 2022
Bringing Down the Mighty: Church, Theology and Structural Injustice
With Anthony Reddie, Azariah France-Williams, Mariama Ifode-Blease, Luke Larner, Will Moore, Stewart Rapley and Victoria Turner.

More events

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)