*** DEBUG END ***

Questions for Fresh Expressions

11 May 2018

The closure of a pioneer ministry prompts searching observations from Richard Kellow

diocese of london

The Host Café at St Mary Aldermary, in the City of London, the enterprise of a new-monastic community, Moot

The Host Café at St Mary Aldermary, in the City of London, the enterprise of a new-monastic community, Moot

I AM not an ordained pioneer minister, but, along with thousands of others, have exercised positions of responsibility in the context of mixed-mode ministry — working with inherited and new communities. It is a model that, I believe, has plenty of life in it yet.

My latest Fresh Expression experience has been deeply sad, however: jointly overseeing a painful closure. As a “standard-track” minister, it has left me open to the criticism that those who are not pioneers by ministry-training label do not have the skills or experience to successfully transition new ecclesial communities.

I have no doubt that this is sometimes applicable, but I find this knee-jerk response problematic and indicative of the continuing need for a deep and thorough engagement with Fresh Expression’s methodology in the C of E.

In this spirit, I would like to offer these observations for all those involved in Fresh Expressions, whether they are pioneer or standard-track ministers.

FIRST, be careful with expectations. Formally applying the label “church” to a Fresh Expression too early sets up all sorts of expectations, which take a lot of time and pain to deconstruct.

Second is the question whether to establish a Fresh Expression discretely or connect with the parish. There may be very good reasons for “going it alone” in the initial stages. No one likes enthusiasm and vision to be stymied. But a deliberate decision not to connect with what is already going on in an established Anglican parish means that there develops all manner of suspicion, misunderstandings, and lamentable missed opportunities to cultivate spiritual growth and missional impetus. It militates against intergenerational engagement, development, and growth. It does lasting damage.

Third is what is happening on the ground ecumenically. Fresh Expressions must learn to listen and to act within what is happening locally across different denominations. It is deplorable that significant resourcing from the Church Commissioners for Fresh Expressions has not always been used wisely in this regard. This can set locally developed missional efforts back years.

Fourth is financial reality and sustainability. How long will funding be available? Is it a sustainable form of funding? What impact will it have on the area and on those who are part of the Fresh Expression? What happens when the funding comes to an end?

Fifth is the establishment and sustainability of a team. Who is on the team? Is what is being built heavily reliant on people at one stage of life, when time and energies are particular to that time? How will the team be affected spiritually by necessary transition, and how will they be helped to be open to and prepared for this?

Sixth is personality. Pioneering can be highly susceptible to changes in leadership personnel. This is because “traditional” pioneer ministry places a heavy emphasis on establishing and building relationships on the ground. Of course, inherited-mode church can also be susceptible to this; however, perhaps structures, checks, and balances act to mitigate this.

Seventh, contextual fluidity or contextual stagnancy? There must be an understanding that context is a moveable feast: vision and strategy move on.

Change, therefore, is as inevitable in the Fresh Expressions world as it is elsewhere. If not, there is the same danger that comfort will trump the diligent continual reading of culture necessary to keep doing God’s best in a changing world.

BY GOD’s grace, we continue to move on here in Duston and Upton, albeit from a place of faded dreams. Many of the Fresh Expression-like activities we are now involved in may not have the Fresh Expression “tag”, but they are both pioneering and relational. We have a vision that, in time, we will develop new ecclesial communities in new-build areas, but we understand that this will take time, patience, and much listening and humility.

I hope that this will be a helpful contribution to wider critical engagement in pioneering practice and methodology. And those who do not bear the official “pioneer” label should not let that persuade them that they cannot innovate, be mission-centred, or be pioneering.

The Revd Richard Kellow is Team Vicar in the parish of Duston & Upton, Northampton, in the diocese of Peterborough. A Fresh Expression, Berrywood Church, which has now closed, was established through distinctive pioneer ministry in the parish of Duston & Upton previously.

Browse Church and Charity jobs on the Church Times jobsite

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear below your letter unless requested otherwise.

Forthcoming Events

Green Church Awards

Closing date: 30 June 2024

Read more details about the awards


Festival of Preaching

15-17 September 2024

The festival moves to Cambridge along with a sparkling selection of expert speakers

tickets available



Festival of Faith and Literature

28 February - 2 March 2025

The festival programme is soon to be announced sign up to our newsletter to stay informed about all festival news.

Festival website


ViSIt our Events page for upcoming and past events 

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times


To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)