In front of the box

07 July 2017

BBC/Storyvault TV

“Consensual”: Melvyn Bragg and guests debate the history of television

“Consensual”: Melvyn Bragg and guests debate the history of television

IS IT a good thing or a bad thing? In retreat from an all-too-frequently unbearable world, here is a TV review about a TV programme about TV. BBC2 devoted two hours last Saturday to Melvyn Bragg on TV: The box that changed the world, an ambitious attempt to take an overview of the medium that is now nearly 75 years old.

Early TV was a com­munal ex­­peri­­ence: you gathered the family, or neigh­bours, around the flickering box to marvel at the moving pic­tures in your own home. For dec­ades, cert­ain programmes or series provided a national talking-point.

Now, TV is thought of far more as a social atomiser, creating social breakdown, as individuals are glued to their personal screens. But what about the runaway success of Goggle­­­box, a series about families watching TV together? Per­haps it is not quite as atomising as all that.

Dame Joan Bakewell helpfully re­­minded us that, when she started, TV was considered the popu­list upstart: the intelligentsia worried whether it would supplant radio (the thinking person’s medium). Not at all, as it turned out; so Bragg and his distinguished guests sug­gested, comfortingly, that each new development never des­troys what has gone before.

But surely TV sounded the death-knell of music hall, weekly rep at local theatres, and domestic music-making? Didn’t the glamour of TV performance make most people think that it was not worth bother­ing to learn the piano? In the 1950s, every pub had a couple of regulars who could play all the popular songs. TV played a signifi­cant part in the mass closure of pubs: entertainment is now based in the privacy of your own home.

Despite his aim of encouraging debate, Bragg’s format was essen­tially consensual: experts from an exclusive club discussed largely shared convictions. The studio audi­ence merely observed. He sought challenge, but had set up a process that inhibited dissension. Only Ken Loach’s assertion that TV was an arm of the state, a repressive organ of manipulation by those in power, rocked the boat — and that was suavely deflected.

I don’t mean to sound negative: this programme was a gallant at­­­tempt, but it was more successful (like all good lectures and sermons) in raising and helping us to formu­late for ourselves the crucial ques­tions than in providing decisive answers.

Here are a few. Is TV a vehicle for sentiment and nostalgia, promoting a cosy view of Britain, or is it un­­settling and alarming? Have drama and soap opera made us confront uncomfortable social and moral issues? Have the horrors of war and famine become somehow domest­icated, just another pro­gramme on the menu?

We have access to the greatest art, and our minds are expanded by ex­­po­­sitions of history, science, and te­chnology. Surely nothing is miss­ing from this banquet of informa­tion, inspiration, and chal­lenge? Oh yes, one thing: religion.

Church Times Bookshop

Save money on books reviewed or featured in the Church Times. To get your reader discount:

> Click on the “Church Times Bookshop” link at the end of the review.

> Call 0845 017 6965 (Mon-Fri, 9.30am-5pm).

The reader discount is valid for two months after the review publication date. E&OE

100 Best Christian Books

How many have you read?

Visit the 100 Best Christian Books website to see which books made our list, read the judges' notes and add your own comments.

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read twelve articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)