*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

A season to learn true value

by
03 March 2017

A series for Lent begins with an extract from the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Lent Book, in which Justin Welby contrasts the economics of God and Mammon

 

Alamy

Beyond value: instruments of the Passion with the pearl of great price

Beyond value: instruments of the Passion with the pearl of great price

THE more interconnected the world becomes, the more power is held over individuals and nations by economics, by money and flows of finance. Mammon — a name given by Jesus to this force — gains strength through our obedience. The more we let ourselves be governed by Mammon, the more power he has, and the more the vulnerable suffer.

It is that extraordinary contrast, between Mammon and Christ, that has made me want to write this book. In so many human crises, money plays a part. Debt and desire for things enslaves many people I know, and draws them into lives that are in the service of Mammon, a master they neither choose nor want, but who tricks them by play­ing on insecurities, on good inten­tions, and on reasonable ambitions.

At a national and international level, every crisis seems to end in talk about economics — not eco­nomics as a tool in the service of human flourishing, but as an end in itself. It seems that in many eyes, and often in mine, personal finances that are in good shape, or a national or global economy doing well, are not merely a means to improve people’s lives, but are seen as the goal in pursuit of a good life.

That approach is incompatible with serving Christ. It is incom­patible; yet God, in grace and love and patience, meets us, blesses us, calls us, and guides us, even while we are possessed by the power of Mammon. God waits for us to find the real treasure in life, and to begin the incredibly radical steps — the first steps in a journey that will last a lifetime — to bring us to the point of losing everything for the sake of the treasure of the Kingdom of heaven.

Jesus talks about the Kingdom of heaven in numerous parables, and in Matthew 13 there is a great series of them. In verses 45-46, we have the parable of the pearl of great price. It is a striking parable because it concerns a merchant, someone accustomed to doing good deals, someone that Jesus’s hearers would have recognised as “canny”, as they say in north-east England.

The merchant buys and sells pearls as a business, until one day he finds a pearl of pearls, more beaut­iful, more valuable than any other. He is entranced with it. He sells everything he has, and buys it. The parable is very short indeed, but vivid in the extreme.

One of the first rules of business is that one should never bet every­thing on one deal, but should hedge one’s bets. Yet here is this clever businessman doing just that. We don’t have any idea what comes next — what happens to the pearl — but now the merchant has it as his own.

In some interpretations of the parable, the merchant represents the believer, who, after much seeking and finding of good things, finds that uniquely great thing, the Kingdom of heaven. In Matthew’s Gospel, the phrase is used to convey the idea of the area of God’s rule. We enter it only by surrendering to the King: Jesus himself. The mer­chant recognises that everything else he has held on to is worth nothing compared to this treasure, and that nothing is worth keeping if it stops him getting hold of the pearl of great value.

But the parable can be under­stood in another way: the merchant is God, who demonstrates that he will hold nothing back in order to claim that which is most precious. The pearl of great value represents you — and me — for whom God gives up his only Son in order that we may know ourselves as loved, claimed, belonging, “held” close to God’s heart as his most valued treasure.

In the shadow of the cross, we are urged to see ourselves as the pearl in God’s hand; but also, at the same time, as merchants. In seeking to ex­plore a small proportion of those things that prevent us from follow­ing the example of the merchant, I suggest some ways in which we can tackle our own reluctance, and the pressures of our culture to conform us into being those who see the pearl, but fail to see it for what it truly is, and thus hold on to lesser treasures instead.

 

IN ADDITION, I seek to explore some of the tensions that arise in our society because we are so dominated by economics and finance, the modern aliases of Mammon. It is very difficult to live well and with right attitudes in a society where the current prevailing values push us in a very different direction. There is much to be ad­­mired and valued in society today, especially in the United Kingdom. There is genuine valuing of people, profound security com­pared with many parts of the world, enormous wealth (even if its dis­tribution is significantly unequal, and exacerb­ated by rising house prices that benefit those at the top most), a commitment to universal health and welfare, and many other benefits and blessings besides.

I do not want to be grumpy or negative, or to hark back to some mythical golden age of Christian virtue. I am deeply thankful to have been born and raised here and now, in this age and at this time. Yet there is also much cause for concern — especially since the crash of 2008, often called the Great Recession.

My concern springs from our turning away from the early and tentative questioning of the under­lying ethical values of economics, and a resumption of the debt-fuelled, crisis-creating model that led us into such trouble in the past. Ethics have become (part­icularly in our political discourse) an economic enhancement, valued but not funda­mental.

As I explore some of the under­lying assumptions, I suggest that eco­­nomics, as an alias of Mammon, should also be subord­inated to Christ, which means being con­trolled and led by an ethic that seeks human flourishing. This has been exemplified in the great system of Catholic Social Teaching as devel­oped over the past 125 years.

Mammon, with ethics as an add-on rather than a foundation, calls the weak to suffer in the name of the general good. There is nothing new about such an attitude. In his History of the Peloponnesian War (a war of around 431-404 BC), Thucydides describes the Melian dialogue. Athens threatened to attack the Melians, offering them an alternative of humiliating surrender and effective serfdom. Against the Melian appeal to divine justice, they said: “The strong do what they have the power to do, and the weak accept what they have to accept.” Such also is the impact of Mammon.

The quote is paraphrased in a recent book in which the former Finance Minister of Greece, Yanis Varoufakis, argues that in good times the global system of eco­nomics deals with economic im­­balances through market mechan­isms, but that these only clear the imbalances when times are easy. When hard times come, heavy-handed institutional and self-protective responses crush the poor. Our world has seen this again and again at times of crisis, from the sovereign debt troubles of the 1980s, through the crash in the Far East in the late 1990s, most clearly in 2008, and in the terrible deflation and economic depression imposed on the poor of Southern Europe since 2009.

 

JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES was the architect of the Bretton Woods settlement that, after the Second World War, set up institutions to deal with the sort of crises that had been created by the Great De­­pression of 1929-32. Bretton Woods worked for many years, until the early 1970s, at which point global events could no longer be resolved by the assumptions on which the system had been built. Until then, it had reflected Keynes’s under­standing that economics was em­­bedded in ethics, representing a vision for an economically and relationally functional world.

Drained by the terrors of world war, exhausted by the memories of the 1930s, appalled by the idea that such events might recur, the world powers of the late 1940s were willing to compromise economically — at least to a certain degree — for stabil­ity, justice, and virtue.

Now we must find an approach to economic justice that works in fair weather and foul, but that will re­quire brilliance, vision, and pol­itical leadership. Another Keynes is needed. It is only within such a global system that it is possible for individuals, businesses, and societies to dethrone Mammon, and to give all for the pearl of great price.

The aim of this book is thus to encourage a Christ-directed ques­tion­ing and examination of our attitudes to everything from our own wealth (or lack of it) through to a critical and prayerful approach to what is good at the level of local, national, and global economics.

Why is such an aim appropriate for a Lent book? Because Mammon is so powerful that an attack on his authority over our lives, attitudes, and thinking is as good a way of preparation for the reality of the Passion and crucifixion as I can imagine. Never mind chocolate, or even alcohol: try giving up materi­alism for Lent, and try reforming the way we understand what is good and bad in the economy. Put all of it into prayer, and find that, although the world won’t change overnight, a revolution may begin, because God is the one who brings new life by raising Jesus Christ from the dead.

 

This is an edited extract from Dethroning Mammon: Making money serve grace by Justin Welby (Bloomsbury, £9.99 (CT Bookshop £8.99) (Lent Books, 3 February).

Browse Church and Charity jobs on the Church Times jobsite

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

 

To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)