PM’s Easter musings cause an unexpected stir

21 April 2017

pa

Theresa May

Theresa May

THERESA MAY’s Easter message was not, on the face of things, likely to stir much thought. It came at a time when the attention of much of the world was focused on the serious possibility of a nuclear war in North Korea — one that does not appear much to have receded — and it was in its content, as The Guardian pointed out, almost indistin­guish­able from the last one put out by David Cameron, which had sunk without trace.

Whoever is put up to draft next year’s message is going to have to be careful there. But there were heavyweight opinion pieces in The Guardian, The Times, the Telegraph, and the Financial Times this year. They cannot all have been motivated by the urge to look away from North Korea.

Nick Spencer, of Theos, had a piece in the Telegraph: “For reasons that are not entirely clear the natural and proper scepticism to­­wards [principle], and in particular to religious principle, has morphed, in Britain, into uncontrolled paranoia. A leader can’t voice their religious faith without being thought of as a ‘nutter’, as Tony Blair memor­ably put it.

“This is a mistake. We want to know what makes our leaders tick, and automatically assuming that if that is Christian faith their politics is necessarily suspect does an injustice not only to them but to the liberal demo­cracies they govern.”

 

THIS is not the best thing he wrote last week. That was a blog post on the subject of the BBC survey that purported to show that only a minority of Christians believed in the resur­rection, in which he explained how to read these complicated statistical arguments: “As with Jesus, so with social research surveys: go in search of ‘the truth’ in a set of data tables and you will come back with the story that best fits your own narrative. . . Being thor­oughly objective, neutral and impartial, I would never dream of playing this game. But it is nonetheless interesting how the survey proves right everything I have ever written, said or thought on this subject, or indeed any.”

Advertisement

It was in this spirit that the commentators interpreted Mrs May, but you should not entirely blame them. That is also the way in which pieces are commissioned nowadays. It has long been the way that broadcast media work. No one wants you on the air if they don’t know in advance what you are going to say.

But there are still some unpredictables. Janan Ganesh in the FT is one of them. “On Easter Sunday, one of the least pious societies in the world heard an explicitly Christian message from its prime minister.”

The next bit of his piece, with the assump­tion that what she said was unprecedented rather than astonishingly similar to Mr Cam­eron’s message, merely reveals that no one believed a word that Mr Cameron said about his own beliefs: “A leader who has to look over her shoulder does not air her faith with such confidence. Alastair Campbell, who ad­­vised Tony Blair as prime minister, called it a mistake. In the absence of serious com­petition, there is no such thing as a mistake.”

But what he went on to say is a useful example of the way in which religion can illuminate political journalism: “The Easter message confirmed something about Mrs May that continues to escape some of the com­mentary about her. She is a believer in things. She has her own view of the world and it comes, if not from scripture, then at least from the Anglican cast of mind.

“She favours a gentle society over a dy­­namic one, views the market with the suspicion of a mild social democrat and takes nationhood more seriously than the univer­salist end of Chris­tianity tends to. None of these beliefs are extreme but they are held with enough strength to drive the gov­ern­ment.”

The Guardian’s news reporting of the story pushed it on nicely by getting Campbell to denounce her. “She does not exactly say if God had a vote he would have voted Leave, but she gets closer to it than she should. If she really thinks she is leading a united country full of hope . . . I suggest she gets out more.”

I can authoritatively reveal that The Guardian believes that God voted to remain. In fact, you could probably get a sermon out of God’s preference for remaining next Easter. But in its leader the paper merely observed that there was not much notably Christian about her policies: “Between the platitude and the policy falls the shadow.”

 

TALKING of great Christian poets, however mangled, there was a remarkable piece by Kate Maltby in the FT: a careful exegesis of John Donne’s poem “Good Friday 1613: Riding Westward”. It is hard to feel complete despair when one of the pre-eminent journals of elite opinion prints something that takes Christianity so seriously and so much from the inside.

 

NORMAL service resumes when we turn to the Daily Mail: “The hunt for the DNA of Jesus: Scientists and religious scholars team up in groundbreaking project to try and find living descendants”. They had got as far as analysing some bones, supposedly relics of John the Baptist, but the DNA they collected turned out to belong to the technician who had extracted it.

100 Best Christian Books

How many have you read?

Visit the 100 Best Christian Books website to see which books made our list, read the judges' notes and add your own comments.

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

The Church Times Podcast

The Church Times Podcast, hosted by Tim Wyatt and Ed Thornton, features a mixture of interviews and news analysis. Listen online

Subscribe now to get full access

To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read seven articles each month for free.