New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Password:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
 
 
UK >

Hackles rise during pre-Synod manoeuvring

by staff reporters

Posted: 17 Feb 2017 @ 12:04

ONEBODYONEFAITH

Click to enlarge

Body of opinion: winners of Rainbow List awards and others at the launch of OneBodyOneFaith, formerly LGCM, in Westminster on Tuesday evening

Credit: ONEBODYONEFAITH

Body of opinion: winners of Rainbow List awards and others at the launch of OneBodyOneFaith, formerly LGCM, in Westminster on Tuesday evening

THE days before the General Synod debate on same-sex relationships and marriage were increasingly acrimon­ious, as momentum grew behind the call to vote against the “take-note” motion on the Bishops’ report (News, 10 February).

The Bishop of Leicester, the Rt Revd Martyn Snow, warned that protests and campaigns at the General Synod meant that “hackles will rise” and the media “circle like wolves”.

At the weekend, 19 retired bishops signed an open letter to the serving bishops criticising the report Mar­riage and Same-sex Relationships After the Shared Conversations. Their letter argues that the report fails to reflect the voice of LGBT people.

”Our perception is that, while the pain of LGBT people is spoken about in your report, we do not hear its authentic voice,” they write, in a letter published on Saturday. Had this voice been heard, the signa­tories argue, there would have been less focus in the report on legislative change. “Going down the road of seeking a change in the law or doctrinal formulation would indeed not have been realistic — but you might not have had to spend as much time explaining why if those other voices had been allowed to come through more clearly.”

In addition, they argue: “You have really not allowed the theo­logical voice of some of us to be heard properly.”

The letter invokes the experience of the signatories, and suggests that the serving bishops may have spent “too much time and too much effort” on the report, resulting in a sense that they are “managing — rather than perhaps enabling or leading — the conflicts that are bound to occur. . . We remember how exhausting that is, and how it seems to blunt the edge of bishops’ own passionate convictions, which might divide them but also invigor­ate the conversation.”

The letter speaks of “some ret­ic­ence” about entering the debate, and acknowledges the “perhaps luxur­ious perspective of retire­ment”;
but it justifies the inter­vention by invoking the “bond” that they feel for their successors, and their concern that the Church “should be faithful in its com­men­da­tion of the gospel to the society at large”.

On Monday evening, members of the Evangelical Group on General Synod (EGGS) were presented with a request to reject the “Affirma­tions” of the Evangelical Alliance. These are ten points on “biblical and pastoral responses to homo­sexuality” which include opposing moves to “accept or endorse sexu­ally active same-sex partner­ships as a legitimate form of Chris­tian rela­tionship and to permit the ordination to ministry of those in such sexual relationships”.

A letter was circulated to all members of EGGS by five members of the group who oppose the en­­­dorse­ment, including a lay Evan­gelical from the diocese of Oxford, Jayne Ozanne. The group wrote of a concern that the present stance of Evangelicals was creating “severe prob­­lems for our mission and minis­­try in today’s world”.

The letter refers to “high levels of homophobia”, and urges Evangel­icals to consider a response to “mounting scientific evidence that sexuality is neither chosen nor change­­­able, and that gender is non-binary”. It is understood that no vote on the Affirmations was taken at the meeting.

JEREMY PEMBERTON

Click to enlarge

Out in force: Canon Jeremy Pemberton outside Church House, on Wednesday

 

Credit: JEREMY PEMBERTON

Out in force: Canon Jeremy Pemberton outside Church House, on Wednesday

 

On Tuesday, OneBodyOneFaith (the group formerly called LGCM) published a series of proposals offer­ing an alternative way forward to that proposed in the Bishops’ report. The recommendations in­­clude the publication of a teaching document “to make clear that cler­ical civil marriage is not of itself . . . a matter for discipline”.

Other proposals include a new sexuality-and-relationships working group of the Archbishops’ Council, “responsible for holding the theo­logical diversity of the Church of England”, a national lead for LGBTI matters at Church House, and the publication and recom­menda­tion of an approved liturgy for prayer and thanksgiving with same-sex couples after a civil partnership or marriage.

In a blog published by the Church of England’s communica­tions depart­­­ment, the Bishop of Leicester, the Rt Revd Martyn Snow, said that he was aware of plans for protests and alternatives to the take-note debate. “I understand the motives behind this, but wonder what will be achieved,” he wrote. “Will it lead to change and a greater acceptance of LGBTI people in churches? I’m really not sure. The media will circle like wolves and everyone’s hackles will rise.”

On the first day of Synod gay members raised concerns about the group work. The Prolocutor of the Lower House of the Convocation of Canterbury, Canon Simon Butler, questioned how safe it would be to participate, and said that he had al­­ready received a text from another member which was “borderline homo­phobic”. The text was condemned by the Archbishop of Canterbury in the chamber as “inexcusable self-indul­gence”.

Also published on the Church House site was a blog by the Bishop of Chichester, Dr Martin Warner. The Anglo-Catholic tradition had “often been caricatured and derided as harbouring a gay subculture”, he wrote. “Irrespective of the actual sexual orientation of Anglo-Catholic laity and clergy, past or present, we have borne the opprobrium, and offered safe space to recipients of homophobia. . .

”Still we love the faith and the sacraments received by the Church of England as something rich and life-giving, an articulation of Chris­tian truth shared with the ancient Churches of East and West. I have no formal mandate for saying so, but that is the reason why many An­g­lo-Cath­olics, and others, sin­cerely and glad­ly accept the reten­tion of the doc­trine of marriage as we have received it.”

And on Wednesday morning, the Bishop of Manchester, Dr David Walker, defended the Bishops’ stance by arguing that a two-thirds majority could not be achieved in the General Synod to effect change to the Church’s marriage legisla­tion.

”To embark on a programme that would require that degree of con­sensus, and then not to achieve it, would be to offer a hope that isn’t there,” he said on the Today programme on Radio 4.

Despite the strictures in the Bishops’ report, Dr Walker spoke of exploring what “maximum freedom” might mean with groups beyond the House of Bishops.

Job of the week

Director of Chaplaincy and Spirituality

East Midlands

Appointment of Director of Chaplaincy and Spirituality MHA is a charity providing care, accommodation and support services for older people throughout Britain. MHA is one of the most well respected c...  Read More

Signup for job alerts
Top feature

Deliver us from evil

Deliver us from evil

Pat Ashworth explains the Church of England’s guidance on deliverance ministry  Subscribe to read more

Top comment

How Smyth justified the abuse

Linda Woodhead and Andrew Brown consider the causes of the Iwerne Trust scandal  Read More

Thu 23 Feb 17 @ 13:08
Coming up in the Church Times next month: PCC top tips. Don't have a subscription? Check out our PCC member offer:… https://t.co/01p0BQLVIH

Thu 23 Feb 17 @ 12:46
@DaphneMoira @Revd_Paul_Monk We do take paid ads online but it far from covers costs sadly. However more open paywall system going live soon