*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***
Important information: We are currently experiencing technical issues with the webiste and it is currently running with reduced functionality, some category pages may not contain a full list of articles and the search is not currently working. We apologise for the inconvenience and should have everything back to normal as soon as possible.

Lord Carey ‘may face explicit criticism’ from abuse inquiry

21 October 2016

PA

Giving evidence: Professor Alexis Jay, who chairs the IICSA

Giving evidence: Professor Alexis Jay, who chairs the IICSA

THE former Archbishop of Canter­bury Lord Carey has been granted core-participant status at the In­­dependent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) after Professor Alexis Jay, who chairs it, ruled that he “may be subject to explicit crit­­­­ic­­ism by the Inquiry in due course”.

Core participants are entitled to legal representation at the Inquiry and to receive advance disclosure of evidence. They may also cross-examine witnesses when the public hearings begin, something that is expected to happen next year.

In his application for core parti­cipant status, lawyers for Lord Carey explained that, as a retired office-holder, he was led to be believe that he would be represented at the In­­quiry by lawyers for the Arch­bishops’ Council, which also has core-participant status. “Once the Archbishops’ Council indicated to Lord Carey that there might be some conflict between their interests and those of Lord Carey, he made contact with alternative legal repres­entatives,” Professor Jay said.

In granting core-participant status, Professor Jay said that “Lord Carey was Archbishop of Canter­bury at the time when [the former Bishop of Lewes, then of Gloucester] Peter Ball’s sexual abuse came to light in 1992, and when he received a police caution in 1993, and it is stated in Lord Carey’s application that he had a pastoral and discip­linary role in relation to Peter Ball at that time. I also understand that Lord Carey was involved in deciding on Peter Ball’s further officiation within the Church of Eng­land after he received that caution.

”The Inquiry will consider the extent to which any failings identi­fied in relation to the diocese of Chichester and Peter Ball are repres­entative of wider failings within the Church of England and/or the An­­glican Church in general, and the nature and extent of any failings of institutions to protect children from abuse.

”It is possible that Lord Carey, in his capacity as former Archbishop of Canterbury, may be subject to explicit criticism by the Inquiry in due course. I am therefore satisfied that he should be designated a Core Participant in the Inquiry’s An­­glican Church investigation.”

Meanwhile, Professor Jay this week defended the Inquiry and said that she hoped to complete most of its work by 2020.

Professor Jay was appointed chair of the Inquiry in August after the resignation of its third chair, the former New Zealand High Court judge Justice Lowell Goddard (News, 12 August) .

”There has been significant com­ment and concern expressed about the Terms of Reference for this Inquiry — that they are too broad, that they are impossible to fulfil, and that the Inquiry will be unable to complete its work in less than ten years,” Professor Jay said. “I believe that the Terms of Reference for this Inquiry are necessary and deliver­able.”

She went on to explain how she intended to make “meaningful recom­­mendations for change within a reasonable time-frame.”

She continued: “I disagree with those who say we should not con­sider what happened in the past. This is a necessary part of our work. Lessons have to be learnt from institutional failures and any cover-ups which have come to light, and only in this way can we look to the future with confidence.

On Tuesday, Professor Jay ap­­pear­­ed before members of the Home Affairs Select Committee along­­side the Inquiry Panel members Ivor Frank and Drusilla Sharpling to answer questions about Justice God­dard’s sudden departure in Aug­ust. They explained that they raised concerns about Justice God­dard’s “quality of leadership” with Home Office officials and that an external consultant was brought in to “facil­itate a discussion” between them.

Mr Frank emphasised that the In­­quiry was independent of the Govern­ment and Parliament. He told the Select Committee that they had agreed to give evidence to them as “a courtesy” after the change in chairmanship and the sudden departure of its senior lawyers. But he said that the MPs should not expect the panel to be so willing to appear in future.

Forthcoming Events

29 September 2020
Festival of Preaching
A one-day online version of our popular preaching festival. With Mark Oakley, Sam Wells and Anna Carter Florence.   Book tickets

 

19 October 2020
Creativity out of crisis: Hymns and worship webinar
In association with RSCM, this online event will explore creative uses music and liturgy in the context online and socially distanced worship.    Book tickets

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)