*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Law and gospel: made new in each generation

by
16 December 2016

The law, like the Christian message, needs to be constantly re-articulated as public opinion changes, argues Mark Hill

MY GREAT-UNCLE, Harold Hill, was appointed Governor of Oxford Prison in 1926. In a memoir, his wife, Dora, recollects their son (later a circuit judge) cycling to kindergarten in north Oxford through a large crowd that had gathered for the execution of a prisoner.

This family story gives evidence of the extent to which the criminal law has evolved in a little over a generation. The idea of regular executions in Oxford, the last of which occurred as recently as 1952, is now unthinkable. As times change, so the law changes — sometimes leading public opinion, and sometimes lagging shamefully behind.

In recent years, legal recognition has been given to gender re­­assignment, to the formation of civil partnerships and entering same-sex marriages, and to the dignified removal of life support for those in a permanent vegetative state. Last month, the High Court acceded to a request to allow the cryogenic freezing of a body, pend­ing ad­­vances in medical science. The law, as applied by judges, is not fixed and immutable, but constantly adapting to societal changes in the service of the wider community.

Moses led his people to within sight of the Promised Land, but never entered it. Today, we tend to associate that territory with unrest and division. In the time of the Old Testament, it represented fulfilment, security, and future prosperity.

God instructed Joshua: “Keep this book of the law always on your lips. . . . Then you will be prosperous and successful” (Joshua 1.8). The need for compliance with the Mosaic law was strict and uncompromising. It pervaded all aspects of human existence. And yet it was rooted in the context of a more homo­geneous society, with a shared faith, for which religious disc­ipline was part and parcel of common life.

The multicultural and doc­trinally plural world in which we now live could not be more different. Dostoevsky famously remarked: “The degree of civilisa­tion in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” Similarly, the maturity of civil society in a culturally diverse world can be gauged by the way it treats its minorities, and especially its reli­gious minorities.

Writing to the people of Corinth, St Paul observed: “‘I have the right to do anything,’ you say — but not everything is bene­ficial.” His exhortation to them is clear and uncompromising: “No one should seek their own good, but the good of others” (1 Corinthians 10.23-25). He urged a softening of the Mosaic law, and the fostering of pragmatic and sensible exceptions: for example, in dietary law.

In post-war Britain, expansive ac­­commodations contribute towards the richness of multiculturalism. In showing toleration, however, one must distinguish between genuine harm to religious sensibilities, and synthetic offence manufactured to promote a political end.

 

THE genius of English juris­prudence is its fusion of common law and equity, justice and mercy, commandment and grace. The chal­lenge for English judges lies in its application on a case-by-case basis to infinitely variable sets of circum­stances.

One of the unintended con­sequences of the passing of the Equality Act 2000 has been to fetter judicial discretion to do substantive justice in individual cases, by prescribing an overly formulaic ap­­proach, which inhibits judicial discretion. In a lecture in 2014, the Deputy President of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale, concluded that English law had not yet found a reasonable accommodation of all the various competing interests.

The decision in the Ashers Bakery appeal was a case in point (News, 28 October). The Northern Ireland Court of Appeal was called on to address whether Christians should be penalised for acting in accordance with their conscience by refusing to decorate a cake with a slogan arguing for a change in the law to permit same-sex marriage.

The recognition of a spiritual sphere, howsoever defined, has im­­plications for civic society, for which the artificiality of the Equality Act proved to be too blunt an instrument to provide a sensible solu­tion. Even the veteran gay-rights campaigner Peter Tatchell expressed unease with the outcome, and with the failure of the law to respect the conscience of the Chris­tian bakers.

 

WHILE the Supreme Court has been hearing argument on the Brexit appeal, there have been some straws in the wind elsewhere which are suggestive of an outbreak of common sense.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission published this month its report Religion or Belief: Is it working?, with helpful guidance on the law (News, 9 December). It dis­pels some of the myths pro­p­agated in the media, and advocates the creation of sensitive policies in the workplace whereby religion can be respected and flourish.

It does not recommend a change in the law to create a free-standing duty of reasonable accommodation, for which the pressure group ResPublica had contended a few days before, in its report Beyond Belief: Defending religious liberty through the British Bill of Rights (News, 2 December). This mood of agitation for change, whether by the “soft-law” approach of the Com­mission, or something at a con­stitutional level, cannot be ignored.

Today, we consider the death penalty emblematic of a less hu­­mane age. Perhaps future genera­tions will regard us in the same light, and look back in disbelief — for example, at the way in which the institutional Church struggled to embrace fully the humanity and love of Christ as reflected in committed same-sex relation­ships.

The past is indeed a foreign country, where things are done differently, and often incompre­hensibly. The law, like the gospel, must be articulated anew in every generation: vital and vigorous, engaged and engaging. It is a process of constant recalibration.

 

This is a revised version of the Annual Court Sermon, delivered at Christ Church Cathedral, Oxford, in October.

The Worshipful Mark Hill QC is Honorary Professor at the Centre for Law and Religion at Cardiff University, and the Diocesan Chancellor of Chichester and Leeds, and in Europe.

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)