*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Delay in nominating the next Bishop of Oxford

by
29 May 2015

iStock

From the Revd Dr Richard Sturch

Sir, - If the Crown Nominations Commission could not decide for themselves on the best candidate for the see of Oxford (News and Letters, 22 May), why did they not follow the example of the Apostles (used twice in recent lectionary readings) and draw lots, prayerfully, to decide between what one presumes were all, like Matthias and Barsabbas, reasonably qualified for the task?

RICHARD STURCH
35 Broomfield,
Stacey Bushes,
Milton Keynes MK12 6HA

 

From Mr Paul Clifford

Sir, - Don Manley (Letters, 22 May) searches for reasons that the Crown Nominations Commission was unable to agree on the next Bishop of Oxford. However, the real failure is the extraordinary dilatoriness that has characterised the entire process.

The previous Bishop gave the required six months' notice and retired at the end of last October. It took a further eight months for the Commission to meet, and it will now be another ten months before it can reconvene to resume the search.

It is quite possible that this supposedly key post will remain unfilled for more than two years. And this in itself raises a question: if the Church of England is content for this to be the case, why do we need 43 diocesan bishops anyway?

PAUL CLIFFORD,
Michaelmas Cottage,
Bletchingdon Road,
Kirtlington OX5 3HF

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)