In defence of Howley and the new biography

by
27 November 2015

iStock

From Dr Colin Podmore

Sir, — Your reviewer, the Revd John Witheridge, is entitled to criticise the shortcomings he perceives in Canon James Garrard’s study of William Howley’s archiepiscopate, but his review does justice neither to the book nor to its subject (Books, 13 November).

He rehearses the well-known caricature of Howley which history’s negative judgements have produced, but leaves your readers ignorant of Howley’s merits, of Garrard’s more balanced assessment, and of the evidence that he adduces to support it. Notwithstanding your reviewer’s criticisms, the book makes an important contribution.

A thesis and a book are indeed different things, but I would be surprised if anyone who has turned a thesis into a book (as I have) would agree that “the only way . . . is to lock it in a drawer and start again.”

COLIN PODMORE
2A The Cloisters
Gordon Square
London WC1H 0AG

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Church Times: about us

Latest Cartoon

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read five articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)