MPs’ lack of concern about contemporary slavery

by
24 April 2015

iStock

From Pamela Lighthill

Sir, - How can MPs possibly justify their rejection of amendments to the Modern Slavery Bill, as proposed by the House of Lords (News, 27 March)?

Without these amendments, a domestic worker brought to this country by his or her employer on a tied visa has little choice but to stay with that employer, who may keep him or her in conditions of abject slavery.

A worker who is aware of having no prospect of staying in the UK, should he or she succeed in running away from that job and finding alternative employment, is likely to submit to a life of long hours, little food, exclusion from society, and physical abuse.

Tied visas were introduced by this Government in 2012. Can this really be called a Christian country? Does the coalition Government or, for that matter, the Opposition only pay lip service to the idea of ending slavery in the 21st century? Why do we not hear more about justice for the oppressed in the election debates?

Pamela Lighthill

41A Coniston Road,London N10 2BL

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Church Times: about us

Latest Cartoon

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read five articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)