*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

John Bunyan and his denominational identity

by
24 April 2015

iStock

From the Revd Dr John Bunyan

Sir, - I look forward to reading N. H. Keeble's study of the events of 1662, reviewed by the Revd Pro­fes­sor Paul Avis (Books, 10 April). It is rather anachronistic, however, to describe John Bunyan as a "Baptist" - or (though it is a term that he did use) a "Congregationalist".

He did not believe water baptism was essential for a Christian - a view Quakers and Salvationists have shared. And he preferred to call himself simply a "Christian", as do many of the Middle Eastern patients (often refugees) whom I meet during my hospital-chaplaincy visiting here in Sydney.

His Bedford church has remained to this day open to differing views on baptism, and, as "Bunyan Meeting", is a member of both the Baptist Union and the Con­gre­ga­tional Federation.

Not all Nonconformists were opposed to a prayer book in prin­ciple. Later, many English Pres­byterian, Unitarian Christian, and Methodist chapels in particular used services based on the BCP, still the practice of a church of which I have long been a member, the historic King's Chapel in Boston.

John Bunyan

Colenso Corner, PO Box N109, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)