PENTECOST is traditionally regarded as the Church's birthday.
Perhaps this year our gift to the Holy Spirit might be an end to
the distinction made between the church as a building and as a
people. The lament is heard too often that this or that church is a
burden to its congregation, who would thrive were it not for the
pressure the edifice puts upon them. Most damaging is the notion
that church buildings are so alien to the younger generations that
it never occurs to them to set foot in one, and that the only
solution is to adapt them for more general community use. There are
half-truths here, but Michael Palin's address to the National
Churches Trust, reproduced here, should give ecclesiaclasts pause.
Mr Palin describes himself as "an agnostic with doubts", and thus
cannot be dismissed as an insider - although he shares more common
ground with insiders than he probably knows. His account is a
reminder of how church buildings are woven into the biographies of
far more people than either the Church or its critics realise.
One lesson that irregular churchgoers might perhaps teach
habitual worshippers is the pleasure of an empty church. How many
congregants are ever seen on their own inside their church (always
assuming that the church has overcome the challenges posed by the
need for security and supervision)? Mr Palin talks of retreating
regularly inside churches in order to escape a tumult outside. Were
congregations to appreciate the particular silence that can be
found in a church, they would perhaps be less keen to break it, for
example in the precious minutes before a service.
Just as church buildings ought to be thought of unashamedly as
places where the Holy Spirit might most easily be found, so also
should the people of God. The need for fellowship and friendliness
is important, of course - more than a half-truth. But
non-churchgoers usually have other sources of companionship. Mr
Palin, for example, is probably not short of someone to take coffee
with. The openness new visitors look for when they turn up at a
church is more than chumminess. There is an ease and graciousness
that accompanies holiness. Congregations, in their efforts to
appear normal, must not lose sight of the call to be distinctive.
The Church of England, as an Established Church, has attempted to
instil that distinctiveness in the whole of society, but the effort
has habitually dulled the radicalism that Christ calls forth. The
standard set by St Peter and the first disciples - who held all
things in common - might seem impossibly high; but many thousands
of churchgoers already contribute sacrificially and quietly. There
is a reason for this modesty: each of Christ's followers is to find
his or her level of contribution not because of peer pressure but
through prayer and reflection, in thankfulness for the Spirit's
gifts. These gifts include both churches and the people found in
them.