*** DEBUG END ***

Gay marriage in the Church in Wales; and the issue of bisexuality

02 October 2015


From Mr Zeph Jones and Ms Beth Jones

Sir, — We were both aghast that Archbishop Morgan (News, 25 September) says that the Church in Wales bishops may do nothing, now that the Governing Body has failed to reach a two-thirds consensus on same-sex marriage. He says he fears a schism.

Twenty years ago, his predecessor feared a split, and was persuaded to appoint a traditionalist bishop. In the actual event, however, in 20 years only one Church in Wales cleric left, and during the same period at least five Roman Catholic priests joined the Church in Wales.

In the wake of civil partnerships, the Welsh Bishops sought legal advice, and told gay partnered clergy that they were welcome, as well as gay ordination candidates. A wonderful spring ensued, several clergy came out, and there was no exodus of disgruntled members.

Surely the Bishops need to consult their lawyers again; for, if a person is worthy of ordination or to hold the cure of souls, how can the Church not at least bless his or her union? It would be ludicrous if blessings occurred and clergy were prosecuted after the Church has in effect already given them a blessing and stamp of approval in ordination.

Having put the cart before the horse, the Bishops cannot effectively abandon the clergy and students they previously endorsed. The front door may be temporarily closed, but the back door is still wide open. We would say to Dr Morgan, Please don’t close it or pretend it is not open.

78 Holt Road
Wrexham LL13 8NG



From Mr Brian Anker

Sir, — I note that, in his article “Freeing sexuality from an either/or model” (Comment, 18 September), Symon Hill states that saying “gay people should be tolerated because they can’t help it” is a degrading statement because it implies that bisexuals can help it. Does the author mean that the degrading statement should apply equally to bisexual and homosexual people? The alternative is that the statement should not apply to either, and, therefore, both can help “it” (whatever “it” is).

If “it” is appreciating the attractiveness of both male and female people, then it is likely that there are few who would deny that. If, however, “it” is translating that appreciation into actual physical sexual activity, then the term bisexual refers to someone who engages in sexual activity with both men and women.

Homosexual behaviour may be tolerated when it is within a committed, exclusive, and faithful relationship. Bisexual behaviour cannot be anything other than promiscuity. Is the author suggesting that the Church should advocate sexual promiscuity?


10 Golding Road
Cambridge CB1 3RP

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Forthcoming Events

6-7 September 2022
Preaching as Pilgrimage conference
From the College of Preachers.

8 September 2022
Church Times Cricket Cup: North v. South
Join us to watch the match at the Walker Cricket Ground, in Southgate, north London.

26 September 2022
What am I living for? God
Sam Wells and Lucy Winkett begin the St Martin-in-the-Fields autumn lecture series in partnership with Church Times.

More events

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)