THE cynics will tell you that nothing ever changes. Don't be
fooled. It is just over a year since 1129 workers were killed when
the Rana Plaza garment factory collapsed in Bangladesh, pricking
the conscience of the world about our blind avidity for cheap
clothes. In those 12 months, there have been some significant
improvements. But new stumbling-blocks have emerged.
Within a month of the disaster, 33 of the world's biggest
retailers, fearful that the public might boycott their goods, met
to agree an accord to upgrade safety and tighten inspection
standards. Bangladesh has the second-biggest garment industry in
the world, and abuses there are routine. There have been 180
factory fires in the past 20 months, a seminar was told at the
University of Manchester recently.
Still, the codes of conduct have brought distinct progress. The
minimum wage in the industry has increased by 80 per cent. Go to a
garment-worker's home in Bangladesh now and, instead of a few
possessions stored in carrier bags hanging from the roof, you often
find a piece of furniture for storage, and perhaps a fan, or even a
fridge.
Of course, there have been problems. US brands, including
Wal-Mart and Gap, have declined to sign the accord, and have set up
their own much weaker alliance in parallel. And notall the codes
work as well as they should. Some factories improved at first, and
then declined. Worse still, an investigation by The New York
Times has found evidence of factory owners' bribing or
hoodwinking inspectors, intimidating workers into lying to the
outsiders, or telling child labourers to stay at home on inspection
day.
The answer - as with suggestions last week that the Fairtrade
mark does not benefit wage labourers as much as those who own their
own plot - is not to give up, but to improve the system.
In the case of Bangladesh, this means looking beyond better
training and pay for inspectors. Western businesses need to change.
They should design better compliance programmes, and set up ethics
hotlines, so that workers can whistle-blow on poor inspections.
They should train overseas owners in basic skills such as inventory
management. But they must also improve their own supply-chain
management systems, so that they prioritise the establishment of
long-term stable relationships with suppliers in the poor world
rather than shift constantly to save a penny on the unit cost.
This is not an easy task. All the pressures of modern production
push in the opposite direction. Today, consumers want an ever
greater choice of products at ever better value. For the companies,
this means introducing new products faster, and pulling
poor-selling ones from the market more quickly.
This increases pressures on the factories in places such as
Bangladesh, where the goods are made. To cope with the West's
increased volatility, they need an ever more flexible labour supply
- and that invariably means migrant workers, working longer hours
at lower wages.
So what is the solution? Next week, I'll make some suggestions,
including some about what churches can do to help.
Paul Vallely is a Senior Fellow at the Brooks World Poverty
Institute at the University of Manchester.