*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Scholarly comment on the ‘lost Gospel’

by
28 November 2014

iStock

From Dr John M. Court

Sir, - I was sorry that you quoted me only as supporting Bishop Tom Wright and Professor James Crossley in a sceptical viewpoint regarding the "lost Gospel" (News, 14 November). Another negative point that I raised was about the support of the British Library in this publicity.

But, in addition, I did offer some more positive points on procedure: I emphasised the importance of investigating neglected Syriac manuscripts, and offered some contextual points about assessing them (date, provenance, and motivation for the original writers).

I thought that the readers of Church Times might have benefited from some words on academic research procedure, as well as the message they probably wanted to hear, so that they could disregard this theory as "bilge"!

JOHN M. COURT
(University of Kent, Canterbury)
79A The Street
Boughton under Blean
Faversham, Kent ME13 9BE

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)