Developments on assisted-dying Bill

by
28 November 2014

iStock

From the Rt Revd the Lord Carey of Clifton

Sir, - Professor Nigel Biggar's helpful article on assisted dying has, I believe, now been overtaken by events (Comment, 31 October). Professor Biggar concedes that it may not always be wrong to take one's own life. Indeed, he even recognises that in extreme cases pain is so severe that a patient must be sedated to the point of unconsciousness, and that the implication of double effect is that doctors hasten death out of sight.

Lord Pannick's amendment to the Falconer Bill surely addresses Professor Biggar's substantial concern? The introduction of judicial oversight would bring another welcome layer of protection to vulnerable people.

Finally, his arguments about the slippery slope are addressed by looking at Oregon with a law similar to Lord Falconer's rather than the very different framework in Holland and Belgium. Oregon has had an assisted-dying law for nearly two decades, and no serious attempt has been made there to extend provision. The Oregon Hospice Association, which opposed assisted dying, now concurs that there is no evidence that Oregon's law has undermined palliative care or harmed vulnerable people. The law you enact is the law you get.

CAREY OF CLIFTON
House of Lords
London SW1A 0PW

Church Times: about us

Latest Cartoon

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read five articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)