The Fantasy of Reunion: Anglicans, Catholics and
ecumenism, 1833-1882
Mark D. Chapman
Oxford University Press £60.95
(978-0-19-968806-7)
Church Times Bookshop £54.90 (Use code
CT318 )
WE TEND to think of the ecumenical movement as a 20th- century
phenomenon. But Mark Chapman has given us a fascinating overture to
modern ecumenism. It is an enthralling story of bold, brave, and
sometimes misguided initiatives, mainly involving Anglicans and
Roman Catholics, in the middle quarters of the 19th century,
between John Henry Newman's secession to Rome (1845) and the
turbulent aftermath of the First Vatican Council (1870-71).
In the first phase, a Romantic vision of the Middle Ages,
inspired chiefly by the poetry and novels of Sir Walter Scott,
generated fantasies of a restored feudal Europe and a united
Western Church. (Why is Scott not mentioned in the book?) The
central figures are the architect A. W. N. Pugin and the lord of
the manor Ambrose Phillipps de Lisle, both recruits to Roman
Catholicism. Their initiative, fanciful and unrealistic though it
was, was torpedoed behind the scenes by Henry Edward Manning, a
former Anglican and later Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, for
whom no epithet was too harsh or hurtful for the Church of
England.
In mid-century, the hero is Edward Bouverie Pusey, the leader of
the Oxford Movement after Newman's departure. Pusey emerges as the
embattled but indefatigable exponent of classical Anglicanism
against the innovations of Rome, and with striking affinities to
the Anglican Reformers and apologists of the 16th century. Pusey
issued a threefold Eirenicon setting out the Anglican
platform of the scriptures and the teaching of the "Primitive
Church". Scandalised by excessive popular Latin devotions,
especially to the Blessed Virgin Mary, Pusey called repeatedly for
the Vatican to define what was de fide (neces-sary to be
believed for salvation). Do we need to take on a raft of
superstitious cults in order to be reconciled to the Roman Catholic
Church?
Pusey's method was to pile up evidence from the Early Church,
citing Father after Father. He was on a mission to explain, and was
inclined to tell Roman Catholics what their Church actually taught.
Newman, accusing him of "discharging his olive branch as if from a
catapult", retorted that Catholicism was not merely an intellectual
matter, but was found in the hearts and lives of simple folk.
Catholicism was a complete package, including superstitions and
excesses, to be embraced without repining. Pusey's was a theology
of the word: textual, historical, logical. Newman's was a theology
born of the heart's devotion: history held no ultimate answers, and
logic was at the disposal of feeling.
Pusey and his disciple, Alexander Forbes, Bishop of Brechin and
the first Tractarian bishop, fought to avert a declaration of papal
infallibility. They proposed to send a set of theses, summarising
the Anglican position, to Rome. Newman showed them that you do not
negotiate with the Vatican. The more you explain, the more there
will be available to condemn. The dogma of papal infallibility of
1870 was seen as a catastrophe by Pusey, killing off all hope of
rapprochement (John Keble had given up hope after the dogma of the
immaculate conception was promulgated in 1854). Pusey and Forbes
saw papal infallibility as trumping history, the victory of an
Ultramontane ideology that had betrayed the heritage of the
Undivided Church.
Vatican I was not the end of Anglican ecumenical hopes, which
turned instead to the emerging national Catholic Churches that
rejected papal infallibility and universal jurisdiction and later
became the Old Catholic Churches of the Union of Utrecht (1889). At
this stage, the main figures are W. E. Gladstone, whose booklet
The Vatican Decrees sold 150,000 copies; H. P. Liddon, the
protégé and biographer of Pusey; Professor Döllinger of Munich,
regarded as the most learned man in Christendom, who could teach
not only Roman Catholics but also Eastern Orthodox what their
Church believed (he was excommunicated by Rome, but never joined
the Old Catholics); and Eduard Herzog, the first bishop of the
Swiss "Christian Catholics", who toured England and the United
States praising the catholicity of the "Anglo-American Church".
Anglicans and Old Catholics were to have "one altar" and to
share in episcopal consecrations; for was not the Church of England
both "old" and "Catholic"? The initial fervour of Anglican
churchmen subsided when it became clear that the reform movement
among episcopal Churches on the Continent was not going to spread
like wildfire, and lovers of unity turned their attention to the
developing Anglican Communion.
What was at stake in these passionate encounters of
proto-ecumenism was the Catholicity of the Church and how that was
to be tested and known: was it by the touchstone of scripture,
history, and theology, or by an infallible living voice? Keble,
Pusey, and Gladstone chose one way, Newman and Manning the
other.
There is much to admire and much to learn in Chapman's skilful
narrative. The title is arresting, but sounds a trifle cynical.
Sometimes it is the Holy Spirit who inspires "sons and daughters to
prophesy, old men to see visions, and young men to dream
dreams".
The Revd Dr Paul Avis is General Secretary of the Church of
England's Council for Christian Unity, an honorary professor in the
University of Exeter, and editor of Ecclesiology.