*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Paper, scissors, and a stone

08 February 2013

Paul Handley looks back on how the Church Times has been produced

Slug-watch: Archbishop Donald Coggan is shown how to work a Linotype machine. Bernard Palmer, Editor and proprietor, is in the background

Slug-watch: Archbishop Donald Coggan is shown how to work a Linotype machine. Bernard Palmer, Editor and proprietor, is in the background

IN 1913, on the last page of the Church Times's 50th-anniversary edition, was written:

The workshop and plant of any industry are not matters in which the public take great concern, except at such times as the present, when its curiosity is aroused, and any information in respect of the production of the paper and the producers, apart from those en-gaged on its literary side, will, we feel sure, be read with interest.

The author went on to describe the "great strides" that had been made "in the printing presses of the world" during the 50 years since the first edition. In 1863, a cylinder press could produce fewer than 1000 copies an hour. By 1913, a double-roll rotary press could produce ten times that number, cut and folded, in the same time.

Great though these strides were, however, they seem insignificant compared with those made in the past 30 years.

When I began work at the Church Times in 1988, as third reporter, it was in its last days in Portugal Street, under Dr Bernard Palmer. By then, it was one of the last hot-metal papers in the country (outlasted only by the Hampshire Chronicle). Having been used to word processors while out in the real world, I had to reacquaint my soft fingers with a manual typewriter (and my lungs to the Consulate smoke in the newsroom).

The journalists' copy, mine very faint, with rows of xxxxs (no delete key), was sent to the editor, and from thence to the compositors on the top floor. It was then retyped on Linotype machines, so called because they produced a line of type in a metal slug. These slugs were arranged for a galley proof, and, when corrected, made up into a page, leaving room for photographic bromides. If a story was too short, the compositors had different thicknesses of metal spacers to put, seemingly at random, between the lines of type, i.e. "leading".

Printers in those days were heavily unionised, though the Wapping battles with Rupert Murdoch had signalled the end of their militancy. At the Church Times, industrial relations were amicable, largely because the editor acceded to the printers' every request - or so it seemed to us journalists, who, each afternoon, listened to the printers departing early down the back stairs.

THE move from hot-metal to computers was dramatic and brutal. When the lease was up on the Portugal Street building in 1989, and Bernard Palmer sold the paper to Hymns Ancient & Modern, the Linotype machines were smashed with sledgehammmers to get them out of the building.

Three floors were found above a building society in Upper Street, Islington, and the staff, minus all but one of the compositors, began learning (or in my case, relearning) computer keying.

 

I had the good sense to take myself off during the worst of this. When I returned four years later, to become news editor, the second generation of software was working reasonably smoothly. My colleagues couldn't bring themselves to talk about the first generation. I noticed, though, that most of the staff used a computer mouse unusually: the IT trainer had been left-handed, apparently.

Layouts were done on paper, lines counted assiduously, and everything made up on press day, which entailed a visit to the printer in Essex, until a modem was installed to send the pages over the phone.

As news editor, one of my responsibilities was finding photos. Some, mainly portraits, came from the Church Times files. For the rest, we relied on the Press Association.

Nowadays, in 2013, we scroll through the thousands of new photos added to the PA website each week, downloading what we choose.

In 1994, we awaited a visit to the office each Monday evening from Glen, bearing a brown envelope. "I think you'll like these," he announced invariably, producing, in a good week, five or six prints. In a bad week, there were only one or two, mostly funerals.

Applying for the post as editor, part of my pitch had been the introduction of full colour. It took sixth months to organise, but the 29 September 1995 issue had a muddy-looking protest march on the front. In those days, the printers allowed us colour on the front and back, page 2, and the middle spread. Registration was a constant worry: we learnt not to scheme small detailed photos towards the bottom of the page.

Since then, the paper has changed in two respects. It has grown larger: in the 1990s, three news pages were standard, and in August just two. Second, during the course of 2002, I moved news off the front page and introduced a full-page photo, variously described as "iconic" and "a waste of space". The news at that time was going through a repetitive phase, and I was sure readers were picking up the paper and mistaking it for the previous week's.

 

BUT, by then, the concept of "picking up a paper" was starting to be old-fashioned. In 1997, to coincide with the paper's 7000th issue, we had launched our first website: four or five stories and the leader comment on an orangey parchment background.

There was another version of the website a couple of years later; then, on 28 June 2004, in a third redesign, we put the whole paper on the web. There was a subsequent web design, and another IT company. The most radical move, however, came with our redesign last summer (i.e. the fifth in 15 years). Until then, we had treated the web as a weekly repository for the paper's content (laboriously reformatted over two days).

Now, although most of the content is uploaded at the start of Friday to coincide with the paper's publication, the news is regularly updated during the week as stories break. For the first time in the paper's history, therefore, the newsroom is becoming a daily operation. And that's not to mention our 7000 Twitter followers.

And the next step? Many in the industry are talking of the death of newspapers. Watching commuters accessing news on their tablets and phones, it is tempting to agree. But our circulation figures suggest that the paper will be around for a while, and we're not in any hurry to finish it off. But a key to the paper's longevity will be our readiness to keep up with the latest technology.

Paul Handley has been Church Times Editor for the past 18 years.

Browse Church and Charity jobs on the Church Times jobsite

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

 

To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)