*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Secession from the Kirk

by
04 January 2013

iStock

From the Revd Bruce Deans
Sir, - The Church of England is often accused of fudging things, and spending too much time trying to accommodate those of its members who take a different view on a particular issue. But I like the fact that it cares enough to do so.

As a Glasgow-born Scot, brought up in the Church of Scotland, I am feeling increasingly upset by reports about the Church of Scotland, such as "Congregation leave Kirk building after seceding" ( News, 14 December).

I now live in Hampshire, and I am a Church of England Rector. If I understand things correctly, I would find it difficult to accept the change in doctrine adopted by the Church of Scotland at its 2012 General Assembly. I understand that the decision was taken in an attempt to embrace "difference" within the church leadership. How, then, does it make sense to follow this by hastily saying goodbye to whole congregations who hold a different view from the 2012 General Assembly - even though that view represents an orthodox Christian position held for 2000 years?

BRUCE DEANS
The Rectory, Southwick Road
Wickham PO17 6HR

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)