*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Out of the question

by
28 March 2013

iStock

Your answers

Why are bishops' officers for non-stipendiary ministry appointed from among the stipendiary priests? Would it not be far better if they were appointed from among those priests whom they are supposed to represent?

I suggest the following reasons. Non-stipendiary priests are in practice under the benign supervision of a stipendiary vicar, team rector, and the like; so there is nothing odd about the bishops' officers being stipendiary.

Second, non-stipendiary clergy are under a "contract" that stipulates how many hours each week they are supposed to devote to their ministry, usually less than "full-time employment". Presumably, bishops' officers are required to be available "full-time".

Third, if there is an unsatisfactory relationship between a stipendiary priest and an NSM, the officer should be able to deal with the former with reasonable authority.

Christopher Haffner (Reader)
East Molesey
 

In Manchester, the Bishop's officer for self-supporting ministry, and the four archdeaconry officers, are all themselves self-supporting clergy.
(Canon) Chris Bracegirdle (Bishop's
Senior Chaplain and Diocesan
Warden of Readers)
Manchester
 

Your questions

St Luke's account of Christ's entry into Jerusalem makes no mention of palms or branches. Why might that be? 
J. P

When did Anglican theological students start calling themselves "seminarians"?
A. M.

Address for answers and more questions: Out of the Question, Church Times, 3rd floor, Invicta House, 108-114 Golden Lane, London EC1Y 0TG.

questions@churchtimes.co.uk

 

Forthcoming Events

25 January 2022
Preaching Lament and Hope
A Durham workshop from the College of Preachers.

More events

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)