WRITING a biography is like
doing a jigsaw. You assemble information from various quarters, and
piece it together. But it is not a nice new shrink-wrapped
factory-fresh puzzle. It is a second- or third-hand one and, as you
proceed, you begin to suspect that there may be some bits
missing.
In the case of my biography
of Pope Francis, there was one piece missing at the end. I could
tell from the parts around it what shape it must be, but I could
only guess at the precise colour. In the 12,000-word interview the
new pope gave last week to a consortium of Jesuit publications,
however, he endorsed the deduction that I had made.
Everyone who knew him well
in Argentina had told me the same story. He was a man who had
changed - from a traditionalist authoritarian who had bitterly
divided that country's Jesuits to the icon of radical humility in
the Vatican today. That change, it was evident, had happened in
only two years, when he reached the age of 50, after he had been
stood down as leader of the Society of Jesus, but before he became
an assistant bishop in Buenos Aires. But no one could tell me what
prompted the transformation.
My surmise was that two
things brought it about: deep prayer - for I had been told by those
close to him that he made all his important decisions while at
prayer - and immersion in Ignatian spiritual exercises during the
two years when he was exiled to the second city of Argentina,
Córdoba. He had been sent there after he had been unable to resist
meddling in his successors' affairs in the province, colleges, and
Jesuit houses in Buenos Aires, when his 15 years as novice master,
provincial, and rector were over.
So it was with satisfaction,
and a certain relief, that the conclusion I had drawn from the
circumstantial evidence was confirmed by the man himself. "My style
of government as a Jesuit at the beginning had many faults," the
Pope told his interviewer, Antonio Spadaro SJ. "I found myself
Provincial when I was still very young. I was only 36 years old.
That was crazy. I had to deal with difficult situations, and I made
my decisions abruptly and by myself. . . It was my authoritarian
way of making decisions [that] led me to have serious problems and
to be accused of being ultra-conservative. I lived a time of great
interior crisis when I was in Córdoba."
Discernment, he revealed,
was the key to resolving that crisis, and to getting to know God
and follow him more closely. The vision of Ignatius - which Jesuits
are brought to confront in the 30-day silent exercises that are
repeated throughout their formation - was, he said, vital to his
pondering on the issue of different roles in the government of the
Church and the challenge of being placed in authority over
others.
"Over time, I learned many
things. The Lord has allowed this growth in knowledge of government
through my faults and my sins." The great authoritarian as
Provincial became the greater consulter as bishop, then archbishop,
in Buenos Aires. Consultation and participation enabled him "to
make the best decisions", he concluded.
His interviewer did not
probe further, which is a shame - for this, it seems to me, is the
key to understanding Francis and the qualities that have the
potential to mark him out as a great pope. His humility and
authenticity grow out of the pain of having made grave errors and
having learned from them. "I am a sinner," he told his interviewer.
"It is not a figure of speech, a literary genre. I am a sinner." So
are we all, and so, perhaps, great things can be expected of all of
us, too.
Paul Vallely's book, Pope Francis - Untying the
knots, is published by Bloomsbury.