Sir, - I am not surprised to read of allegations of abuse
against a senior priest in the Church of England (News,
17 May). I am not surprised that church officials did not
inform the police, and made their decisions focused upon the
alleged perpetrator rather than the victim.
When in training to be a priest, I was sexually assaulted by the
curate of the parish to which a group of us were sent on placement.
We were in our early 20s, away from home, working hard in an urban
setting. One night, the curate engineered a situation where I was
obliged to share a bedroom with him. There were two beds, but he
complained of being too cold, and asked if he could share my bed. I
was young, naïve, and sexually inexperienced. He came into the bed
and assaulted me.
I was distressed, and spoke the next morning to a priest whom I
could trust. He spoke to the vicar of the placement parish, who
called in the Bishop of the diocese. The Bishop spoke to the curate
and the vicar, but never to me.
The curate was immediately transferred to another parish, and
the vicar called those on placement together to explain that the
curate was leaving because of an incident that had arisen "due to a
misunderstanding". This left me feeling to blame.
He said that the curate had made it clear that he had never done
such a thing before, and we should believe that. In fact, we knew
it to be a lie; by then, we had realised among ourselves that I was
by no means the only one of us he had assaulted.
Not one of us, however, was spoken to about it;no investigation
took place; and no pastoral care was ever offered. Indeed, we were
told that the matter was now closed.
It was not only the curate who abused his power. The power that
the Bishop and the vicar had in the situation meant that we were
silenced. Despite a pattern of abusive and predatory sexual
behaviour with a series of young men over whom he held a position
of power, the priest was simply moved on to another parish with no
one knowing the truth. It would be unrealistic for me to try and
bring any action against that priest now, years later, and I can
only hope that his ways have changed, but he is still in parish
ministry today, and, because of the way we were silenced, no CRB or
church record will alert anyone.
I fear that this pattern, of failing to listen, of silencing the
victims, moving the "problem", and failing in both pastoral care of
victims and accountability in clerical behaviour has been repeated
all too often.
For too long, bishops have held too much power in the Church of
England; some have been bullies themselves, and many have
encouraged a culture of defending clergy in all situations, even
when they have clearly been guilty of abuse.
As a victim myself, I would hope for a much more thorough
inquiry than has been announced, into how the Church of England has
handled and continues to handle accusations of abuse by its clergy,
deeply searching in nature and thorough in its recommendations.
Name and Address Supplied
From the Revd Catherine Shelley
Sir, - In response to your leader comment (17
May): the Church's fault lies not simply in silence over sexual
abuse, but in its manipulative defence of the clergy in question.
Detailing the perpetrator's distress at the allegations not only
rejects the complaint, but casts the complainant as the villain for
daring to make such awful allegations. The defence is not simply of
the institution, but of "people like us".
It is replicated in the Church's poor handling not only of
sexual abuse, but other abuses of power, such as bullying. What is
needed is not only Anne Lawrence's suggested process of
reconciliation, but also the truth that precedes
reconciliation.
CATHERINE SHELLEY
2B Minehead Avenue
Withington
Manchester M20 1FW
From Canon John Goodchild
Sir, - If clergy learn about abuse from a victim who does not
want it reported to the police, they should still inform the
police, while telling them the victim does not wish to follow it
up. The police can then file it on a database so that any trends
can be noted and others can be protected.
Some clergy may not be able to conceive of themselves abusing
anyone, and want to be close to people to express pastoral care,
but they need the wisdom of serpents as well as the innocence of
doves, and to ensure that they are never alone with someone who
could make a malicious false accusation.
For good practice, clergy must always work as members of teams
rather than lone rangers.
JOHN GOODCHILD
39 St Michaels Road
Liverpool L17 7AN