Rowan Williams:
His legacy
Andrew Goddard
Lion £9.99
(978-0-7459-5602-2)
Church Times Bookshop £9
AS ANY journalist knows,
there is nothing like an impossible deadline to concentrate the
mind. Andrew Goddard's publishers gave him less than four months to
research and write this portrait of Rowan Williams, and it is
marvellously clear and concise: a straightforward and rounded
assessment of the Archbishop's time in office and his legacy, and a
very useful charting of key events in the Anglican Communion over
the past decade.
Drawing from Lord Williams's
wealth of writing and speaking, Goddard traces his ministry through
the mission of the C of E and its disputes on sexuality and gender,
the life of the Anglican Communion, his interaction with other
Churches and other faiths, and his contributions to public life. He
does it with insight and respect, without letting the Archbishop
off the hook where mistakes were made.
As here, for instance, over
the furore that followed his lecture on sharia at the Royal Courts
of Justice, in 2008. His main failings, Goddard considers, were "an
almost lethal cocktail of naїvety in relation to a sound-bite on a
controversial subject that would be taken from an interview,
opacity in relation to the lecture, and a lack of any effective
response when the controversy flared. . . The incident undoubtedly
did enormous damage to Rowan's media image and public perception of
him, but once the furore died down, his lecture's proper
significance was acknowledged by some."
The picture is of a leader
with a wholly Christ-centred understanding of the Church, committed
to engaging with his critics; to reflecting the mind of the wider
Church on controversial issues; to capturing the imagination of
wider society and to modelling an evangelism that was "journeying
in conversation". No previous Archbishop of Canterbury has engaged
so extensively and publicly in conversation with leading names in
wider society, Goddard considers.
He quotes Bishop Tom Wright,
who recalled listening on the radio to the Archbishop introducing
Bach's St Matthew Passion. It was an unscripted and lucid
account of how Bach's music involved every hearer in the events of
Jesus's death, and Wright reflected: "How many archbishops could
have done that, I wondered - at the same time as writing a book on
Dostoevsky, debating with Philip Pullman and plotting a visit to
Robert Mugabe?"
Five chapters capably deal
with the Jeffrey John crisis (the Reading affair) and the sexuality
debates. Goddard acknowledges that Lord Williams emerged very
damaged from the Reading affair. "Whatever his reasons, his
passivity on the face of the proposed appointment would, with
hindsight, seem a serious misjudgement. . . Rather than seeing his
decision as the result of careful discernment of a changing
landscape aimed at creating space for a more reasoned reflection,
he was portrayed as someone unwilling to follow through his
commitments in the face of concerted opposition and who would do
anything faced with threats to unity."
There is an enormously
useful section on the Windsor process, an education for anyone who
wants to understand those years of turbulent and recalcitrant
Primates' Meetings. On the Anglican Covenant, Goddard emphasises:
"For Rowan, the key to the Covenant was accountability, another
crucial concept in his understanding of the Church." He also
identifies lack of concern for, even antipathy to, strategy as
"undoubtedly another reason why Americans - on all sides of the
sexuality debate - found him so difficult to work with or
understand".
The shrewdest observation comes in the final chapter. "Rowan's
legacy is one of maintaining unity by keeping conversations going
in the midst of conflict as a means of learning the truth
together," Goddard suggests. "But this of course requires that
people are willing to accept that they do not already possess the
truth."