Dictionary of
the Old Testament Prophets
Mark J. Boda and J. Gordon McConville,
editors
IVP £39.99
(978-1-84474-581-4)
Church Times Bookshop £36 (Use code CT132
)
THIS extensive volume, which
completes the IVP Academic's Black Dictionary series, contains some
115 articles by just over 100 scholars, covering an exhaustive
range of topics. One has only to look at entries under the letter F
to gauge its scope: faith; feminist interpretation; floral imagery;
forgiveness; form criticism; formation of the prophetic books - all
examined in considerable depth. Each entry is followed by a lengthy
bibliography.
Clearly, the articles on
individual prophetic books will be of particular interest. These
are both thorough and wide-ranging. For instance, the entry on
Ezekiel first examines historical issues including date, author,
geographical location, and dependence on earlier biblical texts.
Consideration is then given to textual and literary issues, the
message of the book, its use in the Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Dead
Sea Scrolls, and New Testament, leading on to a discussion of its
canonisation. Next comes an examination of various readings
including feminist, post-Holocaust, and psychological, before a
concluding short piece on the book's place in art and
literature.
There then follows a
separate entry by a different contributor on the history of the
interpretation of Ezekiel, divided into four periods: up to and
including the New Testament, Rabbinic and early Christian, medieval
and Reformation, and modern.
The Dictionary is
not, then, merely concerned with a study of the prophetic texts,
but with their use, interpretation, and signifi- cance, from
composition to contemporary times; and consideration is given to
canonical, redaction, literary, and rhetorical criticism.
Many of the entries indicate
a lack of scholarly agreement and the confusion caused by a
seemingly infinite variety of interpretations. But, as the
contributor on the book of Isaiah points out, "The view is sometime
expressed that there is so much diversity of scholarly opinion that
none of it can be of any solid worth. This is a mistake. . . What
counts is not so much the answers that are proposed as the fact
that all the scholars . . . come up with related questions."
Theology is not about closing down discussion but, rather like any
science, opening up the issues for further debate and inevitable
controversy.
Canon Phillips is a former headmaster of The King's School,
Canterbury.