*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Same-sex marriage and the coronation oath

by
21 June 2013

iStock

From the Revd Tim Storey

Sir, - The wide-ranging and some- times vitriolic discussions in the media over recent months concerning the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill have shown that the deeply held views of both sides of the argument are unlikely to find any genuine points of agreement. Equally, the progress of the Bill through Parliament means that, in a year's time, we shall enter a new reality.

It is my belief that those of us who seek to welcome those of all sexual orientations into the life of our Church communities, but maintain a traditional understanding of marriage and sexual ethics, now need to accept the prospect of this new reality and adapt accordingly.

This does not mean adapting our hermeneutical, theological, ethical, or sociological viewpoint on the matter, but accepting the reality that we have been unable to persuade the majority of the validity of the traditional argument in the secular, liberal Britain of 2013. In a democratic society, we may not like the views of the majority, but we have a biblical imperative to accept the law accordingly.

The so-called "quadruple lock" for the Church of England is yet to be tested - and if it fails to meet the tests of Strasbourg, then another, changed, reality will result. In the mean time, may I suggest that the energy currently being engaged in the battle to defeat the inevitability that the Bill will become law should be redirected towards ensuring that the new reality is engaged with, and the Church sends out a clear and positive message of maintaining its traditional position on marriage, and yet within the context of the new law.

It is, however, important to note another consequence of this: if those within the Church who support the Bill, especially those in senior clerical posts, are willing to embrace and rejoice in the validity of the majority views in the nation, then they should also embrace the majority views in the Synod and the wider Church which oppose the Bill, and adapt their stance and statements accordingly.

Forging a way forward requires all parties, both "victors" and "losers", to embrace the new reality, and the Church's stance and re- sponsibilities within the new law, and seek unity with grace.

TIM STOREY
2 Portman Place, Blandford Forum
Dorset DT11 7DG

 

From the Revd John M. Overton

Sir, - Some of the debate in the House of Lords (News, 7 June) centred on the most significant issue, namely, the profoundly undemocratic way in which the Government has pushed this Bill.

We are supposed to be governed through the ballot box, and yet no party had any such Bill in its manifesto at the last General Election, the Government has ignored a petition endorsed by more than 650,000 members of the public, and there is no question of a referendum on the matter, which, some might argue, is more significant for the future of this nation than either EU membership or Scottish devolution.

It is a pity that this point was not taken up by a majority in the House of Lords, and that that House did not have the courage to take such a stand for democracy.

If the Bill had been initiated and handled in a truly democratic manner, those who are against the content of the Bill would have no complaint about how the outcome had been achieved, assuming that the Bill will pass into law.

As matters stand, if the Bill does become law, it will leave a legacy of division which could rankle for years.

JOHN M. OVERTON
6 Brown Edge Close, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 7AS

 

From Mr David Leonard

Sir, - What an extraordinary letter from Mr Donald Draper ( 14 June). He seems to be saying that the Queen's oath to maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel, and the Protestant faith is utterly meaningless, and, in fact, means the exact opposite.

It is that sort of sophistry that gets the legal profession (of which I am a retired member) a bad name.

DAVID LEONARD
Stars Cottage, 4 Mews Street, London E1W 1UG

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Forthcoming Events

6-7 September 2022
Preaching as Pilgrimage conference
From the College of Preachers.

8 September 2022
Church Times Cricket Cup: North v. South
Join us to watch the match at the Walker Cricket Ground, in Southgate, north London.

26 September 2022
What am I living for? God
Sam Wells and Lucy Winkett begin the St Martin-in-the-Fields autumn lecture series in partnership with Church Times.

More events

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)