I WAS born precisely 150 years after Giuseppe Verdi - if
precision allows for a variance of up to 24 hours - and he is
undoubtedly my favourite among those with whom I share a birthday.
This October, he would have been 200; so even the most challenged
mathematically can calculate a significant milestone approaching
for me, too.
Opera-lovers, among whom I unashamedly count myself, have a
choice to make about relative importance as far as commemoration
goes, seeing that Richard Wagner was also born in 1813, and
Benjamin Britten in 1913. As far as I am concerned, there seems
increasingly to be no competition: I am, willy-nilly, stuck with
Verdi.
My Westcott House contemporary Canon Michael Fuller, now long of
the Scottish Episcopal Church, has artfully planned an opera-going
schedule that comprehends all of Wagner's mature opus, for which I
enviously salute him. Recently, when I have organised myself enough
to accept the invitations of others, or book myself a ticket for a
show, it has always been to a Verdi opera.
And so, far behind the efficiency of Dr Fuller's Wagnerfest,
here is a list of what I have casually chalked up in celebrating my
own hero: Macbeth, Attila, and Simon Boccanegra,
all conducted by Riccardo Muti at the Rome Opera; Otello
at the Met; Falstaff at the Opéra Bastille; and
Rigoletto at the Vienna Volksoper (weirdly, if
predictably, in German). Of these, Boccanegra was the most
satisfying; Otello the least. Not bad going, you might
think, but far from comprehensive.
But should appreciation in commemorative terms be expressed by a
marathon, as it so often is? Certainly broadcasters are so
committed, gleefully filling up those gaping hours of programming.
Thus all of Britten's operatic output is to appear in BBC Radio 3's
2013 schedule, and a fitting tribute it will be. Nevertheless,
surely it could be argued that, as with so much else in life, less
might just be that little bit more?
JOHN ROSSELLI's The Life of Verdi (2000), in the
Cambridge Musical Lives series, is the model of conciseness that
one would expect from a writer who cut his teeth in the stringent
editorial environment of The Manchester Guardian
in the '50s. Perhaps dedicated to placing his subject in an
artistic rather than a generally historical context (not surprising
from such an expert in 19th-century Italian operatic performance
practice), Rosselli's Verdi appears as the practical man of musical
business.
Commenting on the richness of the documentary sources for his
subject's life, including an extensive correspondence, Rosselli
makes the rather surprising biographical leap of comparing Verdi
with his near contemporary William Gladstone, another
well-documented figure: "happily . . . Verdi was laconic where
Gladstone was prolix."
I met Rosselli when he was still worshipping at St Mark's
Anglican Church in Florence, and his personal appearance lived up
to the legend that he had already become for me: impeccably dressed
in a modestly old-fashioned way, he looked every inch the refined
Anglo-Italian.
Brought up in England after the spectacular arrest,
imprisonment, and execution of his father and uncle by Mussolini
(there are many streets the length and breadth of Italy named in
honour of the Fratelli Rosselli, heroes of the '30s political
resistance), John chose Anglicanism as his faith, perhaps
identifying therein an inherent reticence. His concise but piquant
prose illustrates how he prized this virtue. May he rest in peace;
we who knew him miss him.
IT LOOKS as though Pope Francis is going to be a man of fewer
words than some of his predecessors. I, like so many others, was
charmed by the directness of his address to the crowds on the night
of his election, employing the entirely conventional forms of
greeting and farewell "Buona sera", and
"Notte".
A group from the Anglican Centre staying at the so-called
"Casa del Clero", Domus Paolo VI, were incredulous when,
at breakfast the day after the white smoke, the word went round
that the Pope was about to arrive. And then, suddenly, the doors of
the refectory swung open, and in he walked, attended relatively
sparsely. He had come to settle his bill; for he had been staying
there before the conclave.
His rejection of the former papal lodgings as "much too big" has
also set the tone for what is undoubtedly going to be a papacy on a
smaller, personal scale. His plan seems to be to pare down the
inessentials to focus on his big objectives. It is a plan that is
causing no little stir.
I WAS fascinated to read in Rosselli's Verdi that the
laconic maestro regularly used as many as three exclamation marks,
as well as "…", "?!", and even "??!!!" to close written sentences.
The biographer urges us, however, not to interpret such lavish
punctuation as an attempt to convey the extremes of surprise,
horror, etc., that it would suggest in an English-speaking writer.
Rather, it sets out to render what gesture would convey in spoken
conversation. All that I can add to that clarification is
"?!?!".
My friends have always known me as one for the big
gesture.
The Ven. Jonathan Boardman is the Archdeacon of Italy and
Malta, and Chaplain of All Saints', Rome.