From the Revd David M. Rowley
Sir, - I was interested to read Canon Michael Storey's letter
(22
February) and his conclusions regarding differentials,
particularly with regard to the level of DBF grant payable to the
clergy with PTO (the retired) in Wakefield diocese.
At 80 per cent, this is more than the two-thirds grant allowable
in this diocese (Derby), and I wonder why this should be.
Nevertheless, Canon Storey had the benefit of being able to
attend a briefing meeting to discuss the detail of the recent
Commissioners' changes.
My experience was to receive a copy of a diocesan letter setting
out the changes, passed on to me by one of the stipendiaries to
whom it was addressed, and which made no mention of informing the
retired. In the three weeks since the date of the letter (1
February), I have heard nothing "official" from the diocesan board
of finance.
Moreover, in discussion with two or three local funeral
directors, I learn that they, too, have received nothing in
writing. It seems that the responsibility of informing interested
parties was left to the local rural dean and other clergy.
Up to the changes' being (belatedly) introduced, the local
funeral directors have, at my request, paid my PTO fee direct to me
by cheque, as my past experience of awaiting the pleasure of local
treasurers, who have probably suffered cash-flow problems, has been
less than satisfactory. One treasurer required me to conform to
monthly claim forms, which resulted in the making of payment up to
three months after the date of the funeral or wedding, often with
reminders along the way.
If the ministry of the retired clergy is thought to have any
continuing value, I consider that those in office, at all levels,
would do well to show a little generous courtesy to those of us who
can always say "No," or "Enough is enough."
DAVID M. ROWLEY
8 Weavers Close
Belper DE56 0HZ