AS HAS been noted many times over the past week since his death,
Nelson Mandela's leadership of South Africa after the ending of
apartheid and his release from 27 years in jail was an outstanding
example of forgiveness and reconciliation. Less prominent in the
tributes, however, has been any mention of the way that this owed
much to the Christian faith that he held throughout his life.
As Mandela once remarked to his close friend and former fellow
inmate on Robben Island, Ahmed Kathrada: "I never abandoned my
Christian beliefs."
Yet he never said much publicly about them. In a letter to his
daughter Maki from his cell, he wrote: "As you know, I was baptised
in the Methodist Church and was educated in Wesleyan schools -
Clarkebury, Healdtown and at Fort Hare. I stayed at Wesley House.
At Fort Hare I even became a Sunday- school teacher. Even here I
attend all church services and have enjoyed some of the sermons . .
. From experience, it's far better, darling, to keep religious
beliefs to yourself. You may unconsciously offend a lot of people
by trying to sell them ideas they regard as unscientific and pure
fiction."
It was Mandela's mother who passed on the faith to him. She was
one of four wives of a Thembu chief, and uneducated, but a devout
Christian. She had Mandela baptised, and sent him to a Methodist
mission school at the age of seven, where his teacher gave him the
name Nelson.
Two years later, his father died, and the regent and chief of
the Thembu people became his guardian. Mandela went to live in the
royal household, where he was given a Christian upbringing with the
crown prince, going regularly to church, learning about the
contributions that missionaries had made to the education, health,
and the general well-being of black Africans. It was after this
that he attended Wesleyan schools, and then the South African
Native College (a Christian foundation that was later renamed the
University of Fort Hare).
In 1941, at the age of 23, Mandela arrived in Johannesburg to
train to be a lawyer. Three years later, he joined the African
National Congress to work for a fully democratic South Africa, as
the black people had no vote. The ANC used only peaceful methods of
protest at that stage, as it followed the ideas of Gandhi, who had
campaigned non-violently for fellow Indians against racial
discrimination in South Africa early in the 20th century.
After the Afrikaner Nationalists came to power in 1948, and
imposed apartheid, anyone criticising its laws of segregation could
be arrested as a Communist. Mandela soon became deputy president of
the ANC, leading peaceful protests against the apartheid laws, and
being jailed briefly. He also qualified as a lawyer, and set up the
first all-black law firm with Oliver Tambo, helping to get
opponents of apartheid out of jail.
In 1955, however, Mandela was so angered by the government's
forced removal of the black people from Sophiatown, in
Johannesburg, that he said publicly that peaceful protest was not
effective. For this, the ANC reprimanded him.
Then, in 1960, two events occurred that made Mandela decide that
the principle of non-violence must definitely be changed. The first
was the shooting at Sharpeville of 69 peaceful demonstrators, in a
protest against the pass laws, by inexperienced policemen. The
second was the banning of the ANC, after Sharpeville. This meant
that even peaceful protests under the auspices of the organisation
could result in jail sentences.
Many of those in the ANC Executive were nevertheless strongly
opposed to the use of violence, above all Chief Luthuli, the
president of the ANC, who was a Methodist lay preacher.
While there exists the theory of "just war" in Christian
thought, there is not an explicit one of "just revolution". Mandela
recounts in his autobiography, Conversations with Myself
(Macmillan, 2010), how he was once challenged on this point when he
was in Pollsmoor Prison in 1984, and was visited by two Americans
from the Washington Times, who seemed intent on finding
proof that he was a Communist. When they failed to do so, they
attempted to show that he was not a Christian by asserting that
Martin Luther King had never resorted to violence.
Mandela countered that Dr King's situation had been very
different, as non-violent protest was a protected right in the
United States, whereas South Africa had inequality enshrined in its
constitution, and police fired on unarmed protesters.
He writes: "I told them I was a Christian and had always been a
Christian. Even Christ, I said, when he was left with no
alternative, used force to expel the moneylenders [sic]
from the temple. He was not a man of violence, but had no choice
but to use force against evil."
The problem with this argument, however, is that Christ's action
did not cause fatalities. Mandela also asserted in his
autobiography that Gandhi's situation in India was different from
his: "In India, Gandhi had been dealing with a foreign power that
ultimately was more realistic and far-sighted. That was not the
case with the Afrikaners in South Africa."
THE Dutch Reformed Church expressly taught that the blacks were
inferior to whites, which meant that it was less likely that the
latter would be converted to their victims' cause, as Gandhi had
thought that they ultimately would. What was needed was for the
Calvinist Church worldwide to pressure its members in the Dutch
Reformed Church to realise that its teachings were, in fact,
unChristian. Ultimately it could be argued that Mandela was faced
with a situation that could have been avoided if all the Christian
Churches, Catholic and Protestant, could have condemned the Dutch
Reformed Church and supported the anti-apartheid movement by urging
their congregations to disinvest in any bank or company that had
financial interests in South Africa. This would have dealt a blow
to the country's economy, and would indeed have resembled the anger
of Jesus turning over the tables of the money-changers.
Eventually, at a secret meeting held overnight in Durban in
1961, Mandela persuaded Chief Luthuli to agree that an organisation
be set up as the military arm of the ANC, but separate from it.
This would not jeopardise the legality of unbanned organisations
that supported the ANC, but not the use of force.
The organisation was called Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK for
short), or "The spear of the nation"; Mandela was to be its
Commander-in-Chief. The form of violence to be used was sabotage,
since, Mandela said, it did not involve loss of life, and would
therefore make reconciliation between the races easier afterwards.
Realistically, however, the loss of lives was inevitable, and did
take place.
In December 1961, the MK started its campaign, using leaflets
distributed over the country, and bombings of power stations.
Mandela, meanwhile, secretly left South Africa, to ask governments
in Africa and the West for support, and to undertake military
training. On his return in 1962, he was arrested, and eventually
sentenced to life imprisonment, with other members of the MK, for
sabotage. He remained in jail for 27 years.
We cannot know for certain whether Mandela's use of violent
protest made a significant contribution to the ending of apartheid,
but we do know that it was Mandela's desire for reconciliation that
enabled him to lead South Africa to democracy peacefully.
His setting up the Truth and Reconciliation Commission with
Archbishop Desmond Tutu and others, to investigate the truth about
alleged human-rights abuses, and to attempt to dispense restorative
justice; his calming the nation after the assassination by a white
supremacist of Chris Hani (his probable heir apparent), by pointing
out that it was an Afrikaner woman who called the police and gave
them the assassin's car number; his inviting his former prison
guards to his presidential inauguration; his giving a lunch for the
wives and widows of the leaders, both black and white, of the
apartheid struggle - these and other such acts were all part of a
distinctive desire for reconciliation, which probably prevented
outright civil war in South Africa.
Before his imprisonment, Mandela used to enjoy attending Zionist
Christian Church services, "with their Bible-thumping ministers",
as he later noted. At a church conference in 1992, he described the
founding of this Church, in 1910, as "an important act of the
oppressed to resist the theology of submission".
In an address to the Easter conference of the Church two years
later, Mandela spoke of the "Good news borne by our risen Messiah,
who chose not one race, who chose not one country . . . who chose
all mankind."
He referred to the challenge that the ANC had faced, when the
government of the 1960s had established a near-"totalitarian grip
over the country", and argued: "I remain convinced that it was our
willingness to rise to that challenge that paved the way to our
present circumstances."
Whatever the questions that may be raised about his use of
force, Mandela squared them with his conscience, which is regarded
by some as that of a Christian freedom-fighter.
More importantly, in a world of bloody cycles of revenge, he has
shown what a human being can achieve through forgiveness. It is
because of this that the world has made him into an icon through
which his faith may be glimpsed, despite his discretion.
Dr Audrey Wells is Honorary Research Associate in the
History department of Royal Holloway University of London.