*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***
Important information: We are currently experiencing technical issues with the webiste and it is currently running with reduced functionality, some category pages may not contain a full list of articles and the search is not currently working. We apologise for the inconvenience and should have everything back to normal as soon as possible.

Under a new head

by
10 May 2013

SUCCESSIVE governments have struggled to grasp the importance of the Church in English schooling. Church officials have been used to reminding new Secretaries of State (they have come, on average, every two years for the past two decades) that the C of E runs a quarter of the primary schools in this country, and a lesser but still significant proportion of secondary schools. After each hiatus, respect for the Church's stewardship of one million of the country's children has been restored.

This time, however, something has changed. Despite the usual respectful rhetoric, church representatives report a continuing incomprehension of the part that the Church attempts to play in education. The exclusion of RE from the core curriculum, the halving of teacher-training places for the subject, and the zero figure given for curriculum review have all signalled a dogged refusal to listen to the Church's arguments. Added to this is the rapid expansion of the academies programme, again with minimal consultation, which has left the Church struggling to maintain the relationship.

It is clear that, at present, the Department of Education is being driven by ideology, to the extent that even schools feel that they are not being listened to. At such times, it is only reasonable to re-examine where church schools stand. Something similar was suggested in the Chadwick report published last year, with little publicity. Dr Chadwick talked of a new "concordat", though gave little detail of what this might entail.

In our view, there are two important issues to address. One is how to replace the tier of support for schools which was removed with the destruction of local education authorities. Schools now seek help from their more successful neighbours or, increasingly, from the diocese. Even community schools are making approaches. Diocesan boards of education, often employing just two or three people, are unable to cope. New funding must be found, and the question is whether any of this will come from Government, or whether the parishes must bear the extra burden. The other issue is to restore the link between a school's governance and the education policy it is expected to carry out. The increase in the number of organisations involved in education has diffused the schools' voice. The C of E, as by far the largest stakeholder, is in a position to negotiate a greater say in the formulation of policy rather than, as at present, read about it in the weekend papers.

To make progress in either of these areas, the calibre of the Church's arguments, resources, and personnel must be first-class. The Government will not take the Church seriously if it believes that it cannot meet its new challenges. For its part, the DfE ought to be warned that it, too, will not be taken seriously if it fails to draw on the wisdom and expertise that the Church has to offer.

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Church Times: about us

The Church Times Podcast

Interviews and news analysis from the Church Times team. Listen to this week’s episode online

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)