*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Dickens and the eradication of social evils: for a novelist, he did much

by
04 January 2012

iStock

From Dr John A. Florance

Sir, — I enjoyed Canon Giles Fraser’s piece on Charles Dickens (Comment, 30 December), but really must take issue with his comments on the great novelist’s sense of social justice.

It is perfectly true that, especially in his early novels, Dickens is too ready to have conveniently benevolent, well-off (usually portly) gentlemen solve the problems set up by the narrative. The Cheeryble brothers in Nicholas Nickleby are a good example of this sort of thing. But even in that book we have the devastating attack on the Yorkshire schools which provoked a public outcry and their closure.

Dickens saw very clearly the need for institutional reform where education and the Poor Law was concerned in his early novels, and later became directly concerned with agitations in a number of areas. He was, for example, together with Angela Burdett-Coutts, instrumental in the setting up of the Urania Cottage, a home that helped young women who had “turned to a life of immorality”, including theft and prostitution. He put his kindness, generosity, energy and sense of social injustice at the service of charities and campaigns that had demonstrable effects.

By the time we reach his greatest novel, Bleak House, Dickens’s sense of society and its harshness has deepened and become infinitely more penetrating. Here he shows a complex web of interconnection between the Dedlocks at the top of the heap and the heartbreaking Jo, the doomed crossing-keeper, at the bottom. The novel is often described as an attack on the law’s delay, but it is much more than that. Dickens shows society as something that, in its injustice and unfeeling institutions, blights lives and militates against our better instincts. One comes away from it with a sense that the sytem is rotten right though.

Now, it is perfectly true that Dickens does not offer a solution to the massive problem that he so eloquently diagnoses. But then he was a novelist, not a politician. What fuels his best novels is a unique, harshly funny imagination suffused by a moral anger that is unique in English literature. It is up to readers to engage with the products of that extraordinary imagination and draw our own conclusions.

One final point. I find it extraordinary that Canon Fraser finds the BBC adaptation of Great Expectations so good. It certainly had interesting points. But the production relentlessly drained the humour out of the book, and Dickens without humour is simply not Dickens.

JOHN A. FLORANCE
19 Sweetbriar Road
Leicester LE3 1 AP

Letters to the editor

Letters for publication should be sent to letters@churchtimes.co.uk.

Letters should be exclusive to the Church Times, and include a full postal address. Your name and address will appear alongside your letter.

Train-a-Priest Fund 2022 Appeal

Please consider a donation to TAP Africa this year. Every penny you can give goes to ordinands in Africa who face financial difficulty, to support them as they complete their training. 

Donate online

Read more about this year's appeal

Forthcoming Events

24 May 2022
Disability and Church: Intersectionality
A joint webinar from HeartEdge and Church Times.

2 July 2022
Bringing Down the Mighty: Church, Theology and Structural Injustice
With Anthony Reddie, Azariah France-Williams, Mariama Ifode-Blease, Luke Larner, Will Moore, Stewart Rapley and Victoria Turner.

More events

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)