AT THE English Heritage Angel awards ceremony on Monday, its
director, Dr Simon Thurley, read out a letter from a 13-year-old
boy. It expressed outrage at the state of several Welsh monuments
in public hands, combined with a teenager's confidence that
"something would be done". Almost 50 years later, the author, Lord
Lloyd-Webber, knows that something, indeed, can be done, but not by
the state or some nameless other. State funding, is of course,
vital; but the preservation of this country's heritage comes down
again and again to inspired individuals, who determine, for a
variety of reasons, that this church or that factory will not be
allowed to crumble. It was for this reason that Lord Lloyd-Webber
has sponsored the Angel awards.
The British love of ancient buildings runs counter to their
apparent addiction to ephemera displayed in the high street and
online. People wish to associate themselves with the permanence of
things, especially when those things show signs of not being
permanent after all. The Angel awards focused on extreme examples
of restoration, bringing buildings back from the edge of ruin, such
as the Brixton Windmill, the First World War aerodrome at Stow
Maries, the 14th-century Blenkinsopp Castle, or St Mary's, Fishley
(restored, the citation said, "amidst costly episodes of vandalism
and even opposition from the Parochial Church Council"). In every
instance, the work was hard, often back-breaking, involving the
careful preservation of all that could be saved, the painstaking
blending in of modern materials, the marshalling of labourers and
craftsmen, and continual fund-raising.
The motive was often the unmatchable beauty of the endangered
building: the delicate ironwork of Tynemouth Station, the Art Deco
elegance of the Regal Cinema in Evesham. The congregation of the
Guru Teg Bahadur Gurdwara had no cultural connection with the
former church school that they used as their temple. But when they
investigated above their false ceiling, and found a neglected
Victorian hammer-beam roof in urgent need of restoration, they
moved fast and worked hard. Sometimes, however, it was simply an
affection for something that was unloved, and a dogged refusal that
this would not be the generation when centuries, or even mere
decades, of history would come to an end. Bequeathing these
buildings, canals, or even a bit of coastline, to the next
generation was mentioned more than one by those shortlisted for the
awards. Those responsible for the upkeep of churches know well how
difficult it is to interest young people in their preservation -
even when (or because?) many children are dragged round English
Heritage and National Trust sites by their parents. But these
associations with history take time to mature. We should not be
alarmed if the impulse to take a hand is most prominent among the
more elderly, certain 13-year-olds excepted.