Petition against gay marriage attracts thousands of names

23 February 2012

by a staff reporter

For the other side: protesters calling for same-sex marriages march down the Royal Mile in Edinburgh, on Valentine's Day, last week. The Scottish government is leaning towards introducing gay marriage, with a proviso that faith-groups should not be obliged to solemnise ceremonies. PA

For the other side: protesters calling for same-sex marriages march down the Royal Mile in Edinburgh, on Valentine's Day, last week. The Scottish gove...

THE Government came under sus­tained attack this week from a coalition of Christian groups and in­dividuals over its plans to legalise same-sex marriage.

The coalition’s petition attracted about 23,000 signatures within 48 hours of its launch, including those of the Bishops of Carlisle, Chester, Exeter, and Hereford.

The Coalition for Marriage, estab­lished by the Christian Institute, with signatories from senior officials of Care, the Evangelical Alliance, Chris­tian Concern, and other organ­isations, accuses the Government of rewriting the legal definition of marriage without widespread public support for the change.

It commissioned a survey by ComRes, which reported that 51 per cent of those surveyed agreed that “no one has the right to redefine mar­riage for the rest of us.”

The campaign has won the support of the former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey. He told the Daily Mail that the Government’s plans “constitute one of the greatest political power grabs in history” and a “hostile strike” against traditional marriage.

Lord Carey described the plans as an act of “cultural and theological vandalism” against an institution dating back thousands of years.

Among the signatories to the petition are the Roman Catholic Labour peer Lord Brennan QC, the former Lord Chancellor Lord Mackay of Clashfern, who is a Free Presbyterian, and a cross-party group of MPs. Prominent in the list are also Anglican clergy and General Synod members, many of them Evangelicals.

Lord Brennan said: “Same-sex couples have all the legal rights they need in the form of civil partner­ships. But, if marriage is redefined, many others will begin to lose their rights, especially the Churches, who, whatever reassurances the Govern­ment may offer, will be challenged again and again in the courts for re­fusing to solemnise same-sex marriages.”

The Equalities Minister, Lynne Featherstone, is due to publish a formal consultation document on how to legalise same-sex marriage by 2015; the issue is said to be regarded by the Prime Minister as a defining one for his leadership. His office said that Mr Cameron’s support for a change in the law was unwavering, despite the momentum of the petition.

He had hoped that insisting that there would be provision for Churches to opt out of solemnising marriages in their premises would prevent splits over the issue in the Commons and the Lords.

The director of the Christian Institute, Colin Hart, said: “The Home Secretary has made clear that the government consultation will be about ‘how’, not ‘whether’, to re­define marriage; and the Prime Minister says it is not a question of ‘if’ but ‘when’. When will the 24 million married people in this country get to have their say? This is profoundly anti-democratic. The Government is running away from this public debate. They are bull­dozing ahead without any thought for the consequences.

“The word ‘marriage’ appears 3258 times in UK legislation. It is woven into the fabric of our national laws. That can’t be just unpicked in a single stroke.”

The gay-rights activist Peter Tatchell said, however, that the Coali­tion for Marriage was “out of touch with public opinion”, and that the ban on same-sex marriage was “discrimination”.

Dr Sentamu, an alumnus and Hon. Fellow of Selwyn College, Cam­­bridge, received a letter from current undergraduates there con­cerned about his recent comments in opposition to same-sex marriage (News, 3 February).

In its letter, the college’s Junior Common Room said that it was “surprised” by Dr Sentamu’s com­ments, given his support for the notion that homosexual relation­ships should not be treated as inferior to heterosexual relation­ships. His arguments comparing the Government’s proposal to legalise same-sex marriage to the actions of a dictator were “completely un­founded”, and he should “recon­sider” his choice of words.

Dr Sentamu’s office said that he would respond to the students privately in due course.

An attempt by the gay-rights group Stonewall to have the words “husband” and “wife” wiped from the statute book and replaced with “parties to a marriage” has been separately condemned by the groups that make up the Coalition.

Stonewall released a draft Bill this week, intended as a “model” for the Marriage Bill due later this year, calling for spouses to be known as “parties to a marriage” to avoid confusion for homosexual couples.

The Government was urged to support marriage this week in its upcoming budget. A think tank, founded by the Work and Pensions Secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, has reported that tax breaks for married couples would do more to fight poverty than Liberal Democrat plans to increase the income tax threshold.

The Chancellor, George Osborne, is reported to be considering a married couple’s tax allowance as a way of supporting families.

Is it right to use the word “marriage” for same-sex unions?

Forthcoming Events

21-22 February 2020
Church Times Festival of Faith and Literature
For 2020 the Bloxham festival celebrates ‘The Power of Love’. Book tickets

26 March 2020
Theology Slam Live Final
Competition opens in November - more details coming soon. Read about the 2019 final

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read five articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)