*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Court orders costs for RCs’ marriage

by
06 January 2011

by Ed Thornton

THE European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has awarded damages to a Roman Catholic couple who were prevented by UK law from marrying because one of them was an im­migrant who did not yet have per­mission to stay in the country and did not wish to marry in an Anglican church.

When Osita Chris Iwu, a Nigerian national, and Sinead O’Donoghue, of Londonderry, became engaged in May 2006, they had to seek per­mission to marry under the Home Office approval scheme be­cause Mr Iwu did not have leave to re­­main in the UK. There was an exemption for those who chose to marry in the Church of England; Mr Iwu, as a Roman Catholic, would not do so.

The ECHR ruled that: “A person without leave to remain who was willing and able to marry in the Church of England was free to marry unhindered. Mr Iwu, in a relatively similar position to such a person, was however both unwilling (on account of his religious beliefs) and unable (on account of his residence in Northern Ireland) to enter into such a marriage.”

The rules were changed by the House of Lords in 2006, which deemed them a breach of the right to marry. But the ECHR ruled that Mr Iwu was still “unable to marry due to the sizeable fee [£295] required to obtain authorisation”.

The court ruling also expressed “grave concerns” that, under the approval scheme, “applicants with ‘sufficient’ leave to remain qualified for certificates of approval without any apparent requirement that they sub­mit information concerning the genuineness of the proposed mar­riage”.

The couple did marry in 2008, after friends provided the £295 for the fee.

The court ordered the UK Govern­ment to pay the couple €8500 in dam­ages, £295 to cover the fee, and €16,000 for costs and expenses.

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)