Lords Spiritual could be reduced to 12 bishops

by
19 May 2011

by Ed Beavan

BISHOPS in the House of Lords have expressed concerns over proposals, which the Government unveiled on Tuesday, to reform the Second Chamber to produce a largely elected House (Comment, 13 May).

The House of Lords Reform Draft Bill and White Paper suggests that the number of bishops in the House of Lords should be reduced from 26 to 12, and that the total membership of the Lords should be reduced from 789 to 300.

A total of 240 (80 per cent) of the revised Chamber would be elected for 15-year terms at general elections under the Single Transferable Vote system. The remaining 60 members would be appointed from a group of “experts”, including former Govern­ment ministers, while a maximum of 12 bishops would sit as ex-officio members.

The draft Bill, which was intro­duced to the House of Commons by the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, suggests that the Archbishops of Can­terbury and York, and the Bishops of London, Durham, and Winchester retain their seats, while the number of places for other dio­cesan bishops is gradually reduced to a total of seven, after two transitional periods.

Under the proposed legislation, bishops would continue to sit in the Lords by virtue of being office-holders in the Church of England.

The Bishop of Leicester and Con­vener of the Lords Spiritual, the Rt Revd Tim Stevens, acknowledged that reform of the Lords was necessary, but said that it was important to “retain what is good in our current arrangements”. He expressed concern that a wholly or largely elected House of Lords would be more politicised and assertive, “liable to challenge the authority of the primary elected chamber, the House of Commons”.

He said that bishops were also worried that the reforms “risk sub­stituting that large body of dis­tinguished professionals appointed for their experience across all walks of life, with a class of salaried profes­sional politicians.

Advertisement

“Nothing we’ve seen so far has convinced us this legislation has really been thought through, and the con­sequences of it examined.”

He said bishops were keen to be “part of the discussion” over the pro­posals to reduce the Lords Spiritual in proportion to reducing the overall size of the House, and were open to appointments to those of other faiths “to ensure diversity. . . But we do have real reservations about what’s proposed at the moment and want to be part of the debate to see that what is proposed is best for the nation.”

The Bishop of Winchester, the Rt Revd Michael Scott-Joynt, contrib­uted to the debate on the proposals in the House of Lords on Tuesday. Speak­ing to the Church Times on Wednesday, he said that he believed that the draft legislation had “not got many friends in either House of Parliament”, and contained a lot of things which were “self-contradictory, un­satisfactory and unpromising”. “Noth­ing that I heard yesterday convinced me: I find the whole thing pretty extraordinary.”

The Bishop of Oxford, the Rt Revd John Pritchard, said that the reforms could lead to a loss “in experience and expertise” that is the Second Chamber’s great strength. “The main question is: ‘What is the role of the Second Chamber?’ If it becomes politicised, there will be a loss of democratic principles.” The Lords, “for all its anachronisms . . . does its job surprisingly well”.

The Bill and White Paper will now be scrutinised by a joint committee of peers and MPs, which will report back next year.

Letter

@churchtimes

Thu 27 Jul @ 17:49
“A wise companion to the Christian life”: @CanonOakley reviews Robin Daniels’s The Virgin Eye @instantapostle https://t.co/e4bEvlgoQw

The Church Times Podcast

The Church Times Podcast, hosted by Tim Wyatt and Ed Thornton, features a mixture of interviews and news analysis. Listen online

Subscribe now to get full access

To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read seven articles each month for free.