From Professor James H. Grayson
Sir, — I was disappointed that Canon Giles Fraser (Comment, 3 June) uses the term “homophobia” to discredit those people who, on well-attested Christian moral grounds, object to homosexual behaviour. A word such as this says immediately that the person who holds these views is “so obviously” wrong. Objections to homosexuality are made the equivalent of race hatred.
My objection is to behaviour for which we are morally responsible, and these objections would apply if the actions were promiscuity or adultery. It is behaviour, not people as such, that is criticised.
JAMES H. GRAYSON
School of East Asian Studies
The University of Sheffield
6/8 Shearwood Road
Sheffield S10 2TD
From the Revd Robert W. Norwood
Sir, — If it is really true that the House of Bishops’ current policy is that aspirant bishops should be required to repent of earlier specified sexual “indiscretions” (News, 27 May), does that mean that our bishops do not recognise the efficacy of sacramental absolution (Visitation of the Sick, Book of Common Prayer)?
One might assume that most of these would-be bishops have received absolution on one or many occasions. Furthermore, how does this scenario fit in with many saints, such as Augustine of Hippo, who were reformed sinners?
ROBERT W. NORWOOD
11A Hermon Hill, London E11 2AR