New user? Register here:
Email Address:
Retype Password:
First Name:
Last Name:
Existing user? Login here:
News >

Traditionalists glimpse hope in Synod election results

by Ed Beavan

TRADITIONALISTS believe that they have made enough gains in the elections to the General Synod to be able to block legislation on women bishops, when it returns from the dioceses. The election results for the new Synod were an­nounced last week.

The conservative Evangelical group Reform and the Catholic Group on the General Synod have ex­changed information on their can­didates, and said that their analysis showed that 66 members of the new House of Clergy (32.1 per cent) and 77 members of the House of Laity (35.46 per cent) would “vote against the current women bishops legisla­tion unless it is amended to give [better provision to] those who for conscious or scriptural reasons can­not accept women bishops”.

In a statement, Reform and the Catholic Group said that, as only 34 per cent of the Houses of Clergy and Laity is needed to stop the legisla­tion, “it can and will be blocked by both fully ELECTED houses” (their capitals).

Just one more person’s vote is needed in the House of Clergy to head off the legislation: “There are 21 new Evangelicals on this new Synod, and one out of a possible 58 undecided is a given!”

The Revd Rod Thomas, the chairman of Reform, said they had worked hard at analysing the elec­tion results to produce accurate figures. “We welcome the outcome of the elections, as it means that the voice of those who have strong theo­logical objections to women bishops can no longer be steamrollered by the rest of General Synod, which is what happened previously.

“The onus is now on the House of Bishops to make proper, effective, statutory provision for those who can’t go along with women bishops. But”, he warned, “I am not confident in the slightest that they will do that, as they have always hesitated over the issue of passing jurisdiction away from a diocesan bishop to another bishop.

“If they don’t do this, what they are really saying is they would rather see the draft legislation fail than create adequate provision, which is not leadership, but intolerance.”

Reform is considering the forma­tion of a society as a possible solu­tion to the issue (full story).

Canon Simon Killwick, chairman of the Catholic Group on the General Synod, said he was “cautiously op­timistic” that a solution could be reached to accommodate the trad­itionalists. There had been a “shift in the landscape” of the make-up of Synod. “We’re not looking to try and block things, but for some significant amendments in the legis­lation to make better provision for those who can’t accept women bishops.

“It seems there has been some­thing of a shift in the membership of Synod, particularly in the House of Clergy, who blocked the Arch­bishops’ amendment in July, and one might speculate that the current membership would have blocked the legislation.”

He said that the creation of the new Society of St Wilfrid and St Hilda (News, 1 October) could be a “vehicle for accommodating those who can’t accept women bishops”. The idea of a society was rejected by the revision committee, but Canon Killwick said that it would not be a statutory body, but would have its own constitution, recognised by the General Synod.

He also said it would be helpful for the House of Bishops to make amendments to the legislation before it came back to the Synod. The Bishops had a mandate to do this, after the Archbishops’ amendment gained the support of the majority of the Synod. “It would be better if it was amended by the House of Bishops, so it gets through in this quinquen­nium.”

But the campaigning group Women and the Church (WATCH) described the traditionalists’ an­nounce­ment as “premature”. “There is no evidence that this view is based on an accurate analysis of results,” it said.

Sally Barnes, media officer for WATCH, said she believed that the trad­itionalists might have “exag­gerated the situation”. There was an increase in the number of women in both the Houses of Clergy (53) and Laity (87), she said. “I’m not saying all women are going to vote in favour of women bishops, but there have been some very good gains for us, and some brilliant people who have got in. . .

“At the moment the legislation has gone to the dioceses, and let’s re­member the vast majority want women bishops; so I can’t see Synod turning it down, if the majority of dioceses back it,” Ms Barnes said.

Full General Synod election results

Question of the week: Is there real hope for tradition­alists in the new Synod?

Winners and losers in tougher vote

SAM FOLLETT, aged 20, has been elected as the youngest member of the General Synod, writes Ed Beavan. He is a lay representative for St Albans, and is one of the Synod’s youngest-ever members.

Mr Follett’s home church is Christ Church, St Albans, where he is the son of the Vicar, the Revd Jeremy Follett. He previously work­ed for the Church Army, and is now studying Physics at Notting­ham University, where he attends St Nicholas’s.

Mr Follett said he hoped to “bring some insights into how the Church can better reach young people to help it move forward”. He hopes he will be able to encourage more of them to get involved in church structures. “We all know that our Church isn’t perfect; so I wanted to get stuck in and help change things rather than just moaning.”

Canon Chris Sugden, executive secretary of the Anglican Main­stream group and a prominent ac­tivist among Evangelicals on earlier Synods, was a high-profile casualty of the elections, failing to get re-elected in the diocese of Oxford.

The Revd Rose Hudson-Wilkin, Chaplain to the Speaker of the House of Commons, was also not re-elected, after ten years on Synod representing London. She expressed concern that few people from ethnic-minority backgrounds had been voted into the new Synod. This did the Church “a great disservice”.

Canon David Banting, Vicar of St Peter’s, Harold Wood, in Chelms­ford diocese, and a trustee of the Reform group, returns to the Synod, while Andrea Minichiello Williams, director of the campaign group Chris­tian Concern for Our Nation, was elected a lay member for Chichester. She said she was “delighted to have been elected”. Her main focus would be to “articulate the great gospel truth with confidence and conviction”.

Others who failed to get re-elected include the Revd Dr John Hartley, Vicar of Eccleshill, Brad­ford, a prolific speaker in the Synod since 2004, and the Ven. Jonathan Boardman, Archdeacon of Italy & Malta, who was narrowly defeated in the diocese in Europe.

The debate over women bishops appears to have led to increased competition for places on the Synod for the new quinquennium, com­pared with five years ago (News, 1 October).

Information gathered from across the country suggested that there were 28 candidates for every ten lay places, compared with 23 in 2005. For diocesan clergy places, the in­crease has been smaller, from 19 candidates to 21 for every ten seats. Overall, there were 959 candidates for the 404 places, an average of 2.37 candidates per place.

The new General Synod will meet in Church House, Westminster, from 22 to 24 November. It will be in­augur­ated by the Queen.

Job of the week

Assistant Chaplain & UK Director

London and Home Counties

Zacharias Trust Assistant Chaplain & UK Director Salary: £45,000-£47,500 plus benefits (experience dependent) Oxford (37.5 hours per week) We have an exciting opportunity for an Assist...  Read More

Signup for job alerts
Top feature

Making money work for others

Making money work for others

Continuing our Lent series on aspects of money, Matthew Bishop explores the links between philanthropy and faith  Subscribe to read more

Top comment

Doing without bacon rolls and paintball

To base ‘men’s ministry’ on tired stereotypes is not necessary, and may be unhelpful, argues Anne Bennett  Subscribe to read more

Wed 29 Mar 17 @ 18:21
Geert Wilders’s party remains a threat, Dutch Christian ministers warn

Wed 29 Mar 17 @ 18:02
We're going nowhere, says Bishop in Europe as Britain begins EU exit