*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Out of the question: Pre-nup agreement

by
15 December 2010

Your answers

Since the courts are moving towards pre-nuptial agreements, what advice should I give couples about the vows they will make? Will the words “all that I am I give to you, and all that I have I share with you” nullify the agreement? Or are they empty words in the light of a written agreement?

The most important words in the marriage are probably, “I . . . take you . . . to be my wife/husband . . . till death us do part.” A pre-nuptial agreement does not come into effect unless and until there is a divorce. In that situation, the concept of a life-long union has failed, and the wedding vows are worthless.

The problem for the priest advis­ing a couple who have a pre-nuptial agreement is that it recognises in advance that “till death us do part” may not actually happen, and thus it brings the validity of the marriage vow into question from the very start. None the less, every couple entering marriage, with or without a pre-nuptial agreement, will insist that they have the immediate intention of a life-long union in which possessions are truly shared.

Even so, it ignores marriage as a sacrament, and assumes that it is merely a civil contract made in a sacred setting. A couple who believe in marriage’s sacramental nature will not contemplate a pre-nuptial agreement, because divorce is not theologically possible.

Usually the last agreement, written or oral, would be taken to be legally binding. The problem with oral agreements is that they can easily be disputed, but a wedding vow made with predeter­mined wording in the presence of many witnesses is pretty solid. But I presume that any solicitor worth his salt will have worded the pre-nuptial agreement so that, when a divorce takes place, it is not in­validated by any oral vow made in the interim.

A pre-nuptial agreement recognises the reality of divorce, without in any way prejudicing the intention of the couple to marry “till death us do part”. There is no reason why the agreement should not actually say this.

Christopher Haffner (Reader)
East Molesey, Surrey

Your questions

Is it appropriate for the celebrant to wear (fingerless?) gloves in a cold church. If so, what are the most appropriate material and colour?
J. H. D.

Address for answers and more questions: Out of the Question, Church Times, 13-17 Long Lane, London EC1A 9PN.

questions@churchtimes.co.uk

We ask readers not to send us letters for forwarding, and those giving answers to provide full name, address, and, if possible, telephone number.

The Church Times Archive

Read reports from issues stretching back to 1863, search for your parish or see if any of the clergy you know get a mention.

FREE for Church Times subscribers.

Explore the archive

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)