Faith and order: New commission is set up to replace three doctrine groups

14 July 2010

THE General Synod has approved the setting up of a new Faith and Order Commission, and created its standing orders and constitution.

Introducing the debate, the Archbishop of Canterbury said that the Synod might want to reflect on the purpose of theology and theo­logical resourcing in the Church of England. The Church had been served by the Doctrine Commission (which had not operated in recent years), the Faith and Order Advisory Group, and the House of Bishops Theological Commission. Bringing these together would provide for a more focused handling of discourse.

Numbers would be smaller than the combined membership, at 16: six bishops, and ten clerical and lay theologians. Scholars would be in­vited for particular pieces of work. Cost savings were expected.

The Revd Richard Hibbert (St Albans) hoped that the Synod mem­bers could suggest suitable members of the commission, and also con­sultants.

The Revd Dr Roger Walton (Methodist Church) gave the en­cour­agement of the Methodist Church for the new commission. It should allow for easy collaboration.

Canon Kathryn Fitzsimons (Ripon & Leeds) urged the Synod to move to putting theology more fully into practice.

Canon Richard Franklin (Salis­bury) asked for reassurance that the new body would not become a Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. He also questioned whether it would be able to fulfil all the roles of the three bodies, which had different functions.

The Bishop of Guildford, the Rt Revd Christopher Hill, who chairs the Council for Christian Unity, sug­gested that the Bishops’ and Faith and Order bodies had overlapped for years. The new commission would have the flexibility to commission pieces of “Doctrine Commission-shaped work”.

When the debate was resumed on Monday, two amendments were carried.

Clive Scowen (London) moved a further amendment, which called for appointments to the new com­mission to be ratified by the Synod.

Professor Anthony Thiselton (Southwell & Nottingham) said that the Synod made its will known through the Appointments Com­mittee, whose fairness was beyond doubt. How well could 450 members determine theological expertise?

Dr Williams said that the special­ist knowledge needed was not neces­sarily possessed by Synod members. “We’re talking about the need for the best specialist help we can find.”

Fr Thomas Seville CR (Religious Communities) urged rejection, as it would not facilitate the best use of theological expertise. It was not the most attractive option to “have your name and career potentially exposed even to a well-intentioned body”.

Dr Philip Giddings (Oxford) observed that the Synod did not make the best use of theological resources. He asked that it could be enabled to enrich debates.

Bishop Hill urged resistance to the amendment, and it was lost.

The Archbishop’s motion to es­tablish the commission as proposed in GS 1782 was carried.

Coronavirus (Covid-19) update

The latest: Daily news updates

Get the free Church Times email bulletin


> Lift Up Your Hearts: 27 March (PDF download)

> All our recommended resources for prayer, worship, live streaming and more


Unable to get to the newsagent or pass on your copy of the Church Times as usual?

Get the paper delivered for the next few weeks

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)