*** DEBUG START ***
*** DEBUG END ***

Giles Fraser: Bishop’s taste for hangings

by
02 December 2009

JUST as the Archbishops of Canter­bury and York have downgraded the threat level from swine flu, a new virus seems to be worrying others. “Homosexuality is infectious,” writes Bishop Joseph Abura from the Church of the Province of Uganda, in last week’s Spero News.

“Africans who have it have contracted it from the West or from acquainting with people who have it. Yes, it is infectious and it can be fought and defeated.”

So far, so ridiculous — except that this is not in the slightest bit funny. The Ugandan Parliament is con­sider-ing new laws that will introduce the death penalty by hanging for “ag­gravated homo­sexual­ity”.

The Bill proposes three years in prison for anyone who knows of the existence of a gay man or lesbian woman and who does not inform the police within 24 hours. Just speaking up for gay rights would mean seven years in prison.

This, then, is the good bishop’s cure for the gay disease: “Gayism . . . is a sickness so we can fight and defeat it. One of the ways to fight it should be by prevention of its spread, by putting laws in place. . . Ugandan Parliament, the watchdog of our laws, please go ahead and put the anti-Gay laws in place.”

The situation has become so serious that Gordon Brown raised the matter at the recent meeting of Commonwealth leaders. But what have our church leaders said? Writ­ing in The Guardian, Andrew Brown was at his most cutting. “I do not expect any bishop of the Church of England to have the courage to speak against it. Give them a hundred years, though, and they will turn up at a memorial service to weep for the victims.”

Hats off, then, to the Bishop of Bristol, the Rt Revd Mike Hill, whose diocese has a link with Uganda, for his words at his recent diocesan synod: “Whatever view we take of the issues on the human-sexuality de­bate, this piece of legislation is so pernicious and so unpleasant, that I hope that Chris­tians on both sides of the debate would stand as one and say that this is unacceptable.”

As it happens, Bishop Hill’s side of the debate is the more conserva­tive. But, as he rightly points out, on this one it matters not a jot.

Using the language of disease about gay people is just the sort of tactic that the Nazis used against the Jews. As Hitler said in a speech in Salzburg in 1920: “Don’t be misled into thinking you can fight a disease without killing the carrier, without destroying the bacillus. Don’t think you can fight racial tuberculosis without taking care to rid the nation of the carrier of that racial tuber­culosis. This Jewish con­tam­ination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end, until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished from our midst.” Lest we forget.

The Revd Dr Giles Fraser is Canon Chancellor of St Paul’s Cathedral, and Director of the St Paul’s Institute.

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)