*** DEBUG END ***

Draft budget

15 July 2009

THE SYNOD agreed the Archbishops’ Coun­cil’s draft budget and proposals for appor­tionment.

Introducing the report, the chairman of the Finance Committee, Andrew Britton, said that the numbers of ordinands being trained had not increased by three per cent in 2008/09, as had been expected, but had dropped to 580, 7.2 per cent below the numbers projected, and, as course numbers were 30 below the 2009 budget projection, the Vote 1 (Training for Ministry) budget had in fact been reduced. This amounted to a difference of almost £1 million. Still diocesan boards of finance faced “a particularly hard year”.

The total Vote 1 net expenditure for 2010 was £11,803,600, which was six per cent below the 2009 budgeted net expenditure. That meant that the amount to be paid by the dio­ceses via the apportionment in 2010 would be 1.9 per cent below the 2009 level.

On Vote 2 (funding for the central secre­tar-iat), the deficit on the staff pensions scheme had increased considerably. Cost savings had kept the increase in the apportionment for this vote down to 1.5 per cent increase next year, or £10,300,258. The amount to be given to ecu­menical bodies (Vote 3) had, after discussions with these groups, been reduced by eight per cent to £1,535,450.

The amount set aside for mission agencies’ pensions (Vote 4) had increased by 3.8 per cent to £830,625, and the amount set aside for the clergy retirement housing scheme, CHARM (Vote 5) had increased by 10.3 per cent to £3,252,900.

The total budget for 2010 was £27.7 million.

In all, this gave a total increase in the appor­tion­ment dioceses would have to pay of 0.4 per cent.

Tim Hind (Bath & Wells) asked if the CHARM scheme would have to be increased in the future because clergy pensioners would have less money of their own with which to find accommodation.

The Revd Paul Benfield (Blackburn), who is on the legal aid committee, asked what contin­gency funding there was to meet any sudden increase in legal-aid applications as, by their nature, appeals for help at tribunals could not be predicted.

The Revd Mark Ireland (Lichfield) said that in Malaysia young people who sought training for ordination were sent out as evangelists,

“to see if they were reproductive, faith­ful, wor­ship­ful ministers”. If they were, then “OK, train them.” He said that in England many people who were able to make a massive impactwere at present “put away for three years”in college.

The Archdeacon of the Meon, the Ven.Peter Hancock (Portsmouth), who chairs the Church Pastoral Aid Society, said that many mission agencies benefited from Vote 4, which was the “only contribution to mission from the national Church”. “It really does make a dif­ference.”

Vote 1 was moved and carried (£11,803,600).

Vote 2 was moved. David Jones (Salisbury) said that he did not think that there had been an external evaluation of the Archbishops’ Council’s work, and there should be. “We should be putting some money into the budget for it.” The Vote was carried (£10,300,258).

Vote 3 (£1,535,450), Vote 4 (£830,625), and Vote 5 (£3,252,900) were all moved and car­ried. The Synod then approved the table of apportionment (GS1730) for “the apportion­ment amongst the dioceses of the net sum to be provided by them to enable the Council to meet the expected expenditure shown in its budget for the year 2010”.

Coronavirus (Covid-19) update

The latest: Daily news updates

Get the free Church Times email bulletin


> Lift Up Your Hearts: 5 June (PDF download)

> All our recommended resources for prayer, worship, live streaming and more


Record your experience of the pandemic, the ministry that you have given or received, and what you think will happen to churches in a post-pandemic world

> Take the survey

Welcome to the Church Times

​To explore the Church Times website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read four articles for free each month. (You will need to register.)